Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 1 of 1
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 3 August 2015

Is disaster “normal” for indigenous people? Indigenous knowledge and coping practices

Dorothea Hilhorst, Judith Baart, Gemma van der Haar and Floor Maria Leeftink

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to debates on the value of indigenous knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Recent international policy papers advocate the…

HTML
PDF (150 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to debates on the value of indigenous knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Recent international policy papers advocate the importance of indigenous knowledge and calls for its recognition. The paper aims to explore these issues in the everyday practices of disaster response by indigenous peoples and surrounding actors.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper is based on a total of seven months ethnographic research in indigenous communities in Thailand and the Philippines. The Thai communities had experienced minor disasters, whereas the Philippine communities were recently hit by a major killer typhoon.

Findings

In both countries the authors found that indigenous knowledge is neither completely local, nor homogenous, nor shared. The findings caution against a view that indigenous knowledge is grounded in a long tradition of coping with disasters. Coping is embedded in social practice and responsive to change. Positive labelling of indigenous practices can help to render communities more resilient.

Research limitations/implications

The research was exploratory in nature and could be replicated and expanded in other indigenous peoples’ communities.

Practical implications

Rather than understanding indigenous peoples as simultaneously vulnerable and resilient, it calls for a more comprehensive approach to indigenous knowledge and practices around disaster.

Social implications

The limitations are shown of uncritically ascribing indigenous communities a close relation to nature. It may be unfounded and de-politicises indigenous struggles.

Originality/value

This paper approaches indigenous knowledge issues from the point of view of indigenous communities themselves.

Details

Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 24 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2015-0027
ISSN: 0965-3562

Keywords

  • Resilience
  • Natural hazard
  • Indigenous peoples
  • State-society relations

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (1)
Content type
  • Article (1)
1 – 1 of 1
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here