Search results

The facility management (FM) sector, which is developing rapidly, is making slower progress in Turkey compared to Europe and the USA. This paper aims to research the underlying issues leading to FM practices and offer insights into the implications of FM-related policies, especially for large urban transformation projects.

The study used a mixed-methods research design and collected qualitative data through semi-structured interviews with building/site managers and quantitative data through structured surveys with residents. Forty-nine building/site managers and 660 residents participated in the interview and survey from Turkey’s North Ankara and Dikmen Valley urban transformation projects.

The FM by residents, performed by the managers selected among homeowners, was preferred to the professional FM in Turkey. Education level, age, homeownership and duration of living in the region were associated with selecting FM practices. Cost also had an important place among the selection criteria, and the standard view from the residents was that professional FM would cause a cost increase. However, interviews with building/site managers in North Ankara and Dikmen Valley Urban Transformation areas revealed that a significant part of the problem resulted from insufficient knowledge and experience in FM.

Within the scope of the research, two urban transformation projects in Ankara Province were selected, and the survey was limited to the North Ankara Entrance Urban Transformation Project and Dikmen Valley Urban Transformation Project areas. Although there is a need to improve the understanding of FM in all facilities, built environments and collective buildings, collective buildings in urban transformation areas due to several constraints, those other identified areas are postponed for future study. In addition, collective buildings located in transformation areas differ from others in discussing the social dimension and the impact of management.

Within the scope of the research, two urban transformation projects in Ankara Province were selected, and the survey was limited to the North Ankara Entrance Urban Transformation Project and Dikmen Valley Urban Transformation Project areas. Although there is a need to improve the understanding of FM in all facilities, due to several constraints built environments and collective buildings in urban transformation areas, are postponed for future study. In addition, collective buildings located in transformation areas differ from others in discussing the social dimension and the impact of management.

This study evaluates two different FM approaches: FM by residents and professional FM, implemented in Turkey and identifies the criteria for choosing the FM practice. In addition, both building/site managers and residents evaluate different perspectives on FM. This study is unique because it compares different FM practices in Turkey and the criteria for residents to prefer different FM practices.

Housing market research involves observing the relationships between housing value and its indicators. However, recent literature indicates that the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic could have an impact on the forecasting properties of some of the housing indicators. This paper aims to observe the relationships between the home value index and three potential indicators to verify their forecasting properties pre- and post-COVID-19 and provide general recommendations for time series research post-pandemic.

This study features three vector autoregression (VAR) models constructed using the home value index of the USA, together with three indicators that are of interest according to recent literature: the national unemployment rate, private residential construction spending (PRCS) and the housing consumer price index (HCPI).

Unemployment, one of the prevalent indicators for housing values, was compromised as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a new indicator for housing value in the USA, PRCS, whose relationship with housing value is robust even during the COVID-19 pandemic and HCPI is a more significant indicator for housing value than the prevalently cited All-Item consumer price index (CPI).

The study adds residential construction spending into the pool of housing indicators, proves that the finding of region-specific study indicating the unbounding of housing prices from unemployment is applicable to the aggregate housing market in the USA, and improves upon such widely accepted belief that overall inflation is a key indicator for housing prices and proves that the CPI for housing is a vastly more significant indicator.