Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Article
Publication date: 14 September 2010

Dieter Verhaest and Eddy Omey

The purpose of this paper is to assess the measurement sensitivity of the estimated determinants of overeducation.

1758

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess the measurement sensitivity of the estimated determinants of overeducation.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper analyses the determinants of overeducation among Flemish school leavers in their first job by means of probit regression analysis. Overeducation is measured on the basis of job analysis (JA), self‐assessments and realised matches.

Findings

The results demonstrate that the application of different overeducation measures sometimes leads to different outcomes. Only a few variables – for instance the student's academic grade in the final year – are consistently found to be important for the explanation of overeducation. Some outcomes are consistent with the supposition that several indicators actually measure other concepts.

Research limitations/implications

Further research using JA measures that are based on alternative and more recent occupational classifications would be useful.

Originality/value

The application of different measures provides further insight into the overeducation measurement problem.

Details

International Journal of Manpower, vol. 31 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0143-7720

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 6 June 2016

Dieter Verhaest and Elsy Verhofstadt

– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how job demands and control contribute to the relationship between overeducation and job satisfaction.

2885

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how job demands and control contribute to the relationship between overeducation and job satisfaction.

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis is based on data for Belgian young workers up to the age of 26. The authors execute regression analyses, with autonomy, quantitative demands and job satisfaction as dependent variables. The authors account for unobserved individual heterogeneity by means of panel-data techniques.

Findings

The results reveal a significant role of demands and control for the relationship between overeducation and job satisfaction. At career start, overeducated workers have less control than adequately educated individuals with similar skills levels, but more control than adequately educated employees doing similar work. Moreover, their control increases faster over the career than that of adequately educated workers with a similar educational background. Finally, demands have less adverse effects on satisfaction for high-skilled workers, irrespective of their match, while control moderates the negative satisfaction effect of overeducation.

Research limitations/implications

Future research should look beyond the early career and focus on other potential compensation mechanisms for overeducation. Also the role of underlying mechanisms, such as job crafting, deserves more attention.

Practical implications

The results suggest that providing more autonomy is an effective strategy to avoid job dissatisfaction among overeducated workers.

Originality/value

The study connects two areas of research, namely, that on overeducation and its consequences and that on the role of job demands and control for workers’ well-being. The results contribute to a better understanding why overeducation persists. Moreover, they are consistent with the hypothesis that employers hire overeducated workers because they require less monitoring and are more able to cope with demands, although more direct evidence on this is needed.

Details

International Journal of Manpower, vol. 37 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0143-7720

Keywords

Access

Year

Content type

Article (2)
1 – 2 of 2