Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 10 of over 11000
To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 1 February 2007

On the Distinction Between Cultural and Cross-Cultural Psychological Approaches and its Significance for Consumer Psychology

Giana M. Eckhardt and Michael J. Houston

HTML
PDF (565 KB)

Abstract

Details

Review of Marketing Research
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2007)0000003007
ISBN: 978-0-7656-1306-6

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 December 2004

The impact of the English language on cross‐cultural consumer research in Asia and Latin America

Gregory S. Black

This article reports a study using respondents from three different cultures – traditional Americans, Hispanics, and Taiwanese – to assess the reliabilities of measures…

HTML
PDF (535 KB)

Abstract

This article reports a study using respondents from three different cultures – traditional Americans, Hispanics, and Taiwanese – to assess the reliabilities of measures assessing 29 consumer constructs used in various studies reported in major marketing journals. In general, these measures were designed for use with a traditional American sample and are not reported to have been used with other cultural samples. Results indicate that for respondents who demonstrate a certain level of English language fluency, regardless of where they are from, these measures perform reliably across cultures. Thus, under certain circumstances, the fears that researchers have about instrument reliability across cultures may be largely ungrounded.

Details

Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 16 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850410765249
ISSN: 1355-5855

Keywords

  • Cross cultural studies
  • Languages
  • Market research

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 2 November 2010

The cross‐cultural appropriateness of survey‐based value(s) research: A review of methodological issues and suggestion of alternative methodology

Leah Watkins

Cross‐cultural research in marketing has been dominated by survey‐based quantitative approaches; however, the assumption of prior validity required for the adoption of the…

HTML
PDF (131 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Cross‐cultural research in marketing has been dominated by survey‐based quantitative approaches; however, the assumption of prior validity required for the adoption of the survey approach to values in cross‐cultural research has yet to be established. This paper aims to review the literature and outlines the problems of the survey‐based approach to cross‐cultural values research. These criticisms relate both to the choice of the method and its execution. The paper outlines the multiplicative effects of these problems, that threaten the validity of the survey methodology in this context, and suggests a methodological alternative.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper reviews and synthesises the relevant literature on conceptual and methodological issues pertinent to the survey approach to values research in a cross‐cultural context.

Findings

A review of the literature suggests numerous methodological problems that threaten the validity and reliability of the survey approach to cross‐cultural values research. This review exposes a methodological gap that can be filled by a qualitative approach to the study of values in cross‐cultural research. In particular, the paper advocates means‐end methodology as offering significant strengths and addressing several of the weaknesses of the survey‐based approach to cross‐cultural values research.

Originality/value

The paper synthesises the literature on methodological issues in cross‐cultural values research, bringing together disparate criticisms which reveal the range of unresolved problems with the empirical, survey‐based approach to cross‐cultural values research; the paper also offers a suggestion for an alternative methodological approach. The means‐end approach is increasingly being used in various research areas; this paper highlights its appropriateness in a cross‐cultural context, as an alternative to predefined and culturally determined measures that limit our understanding of cross‐cultural values. Means‐end addresses many of the specific weaknesses of the survey method identified in the literature review. This discussion of methodological issues has implications for the field of cross‐cultural research more generally and suggests a critical re‐assessment of cross‐cultural methods is needed.

Details

International Marketing Review, vol. 27 no. 6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011088290
ISSN: 0265-1335

Keywords

  • Cross‐cultural studies
  • Qualitative methods
  • Surveys
  • Research

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 February 2001

An integrative framework for cross‐cultural consumer behavior

David Luna and Susan Forquer Gupta

The world economy is becoming increasingly cross‐cultural. During the next decades, as marketers enter new international markets, an understanding of how culture…

HTML
PDF (237 KB)

Abstract

The world economy is becoming increasingly cross‐cultural. During the next decades, as marketers enter new international markets, an understanding of how culture influences consumer behavior will be crucial for both managers and consumer researchers. This article presents a framework that integrates and reinterprets current research in cross‐cultural consumer behavior. The framework also serves to identify areas that need further research and can be used as a template for marketers seeking to understand their foreign consumers. The article also attempts to integrate from an applied perspective two distinct traditions in the study of culture and consumer behavior: the anthropological approach and the cross‐cultural psychology tradition.

Details

International Marketing Review, vol. 18 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330110381998
ISSN: 0265-1335

Keywords

  • International marketing
  • Consumer behaviour
  • National cultures
  • Cross‐cultural management

To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 1 February 2007

Language, Thought, and Consumer Research

Dwight R. Merunka and Robert A. Peterson

HTML
PDF (627 KB)

Abstract

Details

Review of Marketing Research
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2007)0000003010
ISBN: 978-0-7656-1306-6

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 10 September 2018

Cross-cultural effects of self-discrepancy on the consumption of counterfeit branded luxuries

Jiongen Xiao, Chunyu Li and Ling Peng

Consumers’ motivations for purchasing counterfeit branded luxuries are a topic of heated discussion amongst academics and practitioners. Drawing on self-discrepancy…

HTML
PDF (236 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Consumers’ motivations for purchasing counterfeit branded luxuries are a topic of heated discussion amongst academics and practitioners. Drawing on self-discrepancy theory, the purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of actual-ideal self-discrepancy on consumers’ attitudes towards counterfeit branded luxuries. It investigates how self-monitoring and perceived social risk moderate this effect. Furthermore, it explores cross-cultural differences in the impact of actual-ideal self-discrepancy.

Design/methodology/approach

A pilot study provides preliminary evidence that highlights the importance of actual-ideal self-discrepancy in counterfeit consumption. Based upon a large-scale survey across Hong Kong, the USA and Australia, the principal study explores the moderating effect of self-monitoring and perceived social risk as well as cross-cultural differences.

Findings

The results indicate that self-discrepancy increases consumers’ tendency to engage in symbolic consumption, and that consumption of counterfeit branded luxuries can serve the social function of self-expression to reduce the discomfort induced by self-discrepancy. Self-monitoring and perceived social risk have significant moderating effects, with the former strengthening and the latter attenuating this effect. Moreover, the effect of self-discrepancy is more pronounced amongst individualistic consumers than collectivistic consumers.

Originality/value

This is the first study to highlight the significance of self-discrepancy in the consumption of counterfeit branded luxuries. It examines the important moderating effects of self-monitoring and perceived social risk. Consumers from collectivistic and individualistic cultures define their self-concept differently, thus the findings provide meaningful cross-cultural information on the impact of self-discrepancy in counterfeit consumption.

Details

Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 30 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-12-2017-0341
ISSN: 1355-5855

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural differences
  • Self-monitoring
  • Counterfeit branded luxuries
  • Perceived social risk
  • Self-discrepancy

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 2 September 2014

Ethical fashion dimensions: pictorial and auditory depictions through three cultural perspectives

Lindsey Carey and Marie-Cécile Cervellon

The purpose of this paper is to provide the results of an exploratory study comparing attitudes of young fashion conscious consumers towards ethical fashion in Canada…

HTML
PDF (656 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide the results of an exploratory study comparing attitudes of young fashion conscious consumers towards ethical fashion in Canada, France and the UK.

Design/methodology/approach

The methods used in this research were qualitative with a mix of interviews and focus groups and a new application of a visual method widely used within design and fashion environments, the mood board. The study is based within the contrast of a growing trend towards sustainability and the rise of fast fashion where consumers are increasingly demanding cheaper items. The research is also grounded in cross-cultural research where the comparison of data emanating from different cultures and languages presents specific dilemmas for researchers.

Findings

Results indicated that there were notable differences in the perception of ethical fashion between the respondents from these three cultures. In the representation and appeal of this fashion segment, in terms of its perceived availability, the transfer of meaning connected with the observation of higher price points and in the use of ethical purchases in the fashion arena as an offset or redemption for unethical behaviour in other contexts.

Originality/value

The originality of this paper lies in the innovative use of the visual qualitative methods which contributes to the debate concerning the research methods associated with cross-cultural research and extends the restricted body of literature which compares cultural attitudes in this area by offering key insights into the complex issues surrounding ethical fashion consumption.

Details

Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 18 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-11-2012-0067
ISSN: 1361-2026

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural research
  • Visual techniques
  • Ethical fashion
  • Mood boards

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 May 2005

Measuring transaction‐specific satisfaction in services: Are the measures transferable across cultures?

Cleopatra Veloutsou, G. Ronald Gilbert, Luiz A. Moutinho and Mark M.H. Goode

This study examines the equivalence of the use of a customer satisfaction survey in four culturally divergent contexts.

HTML
PDF (128 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the equivalence of the use of a customer satisfaction survey in four culturally divergent contexts.

Design/methodology/approach

It is based on 6,776 responses collected from fast food customers in Greece, Jamaica, the UK and the USA.

Findings

The results reveal that the similarities in the measurement of satisfaction in these contexts are more than the differences, and suggest that the development of measures to examine and compare consumer satisfaction across cultures and languages is, indeed, feasible.

Research limitations/implications

The data reveal considerable promise that rather simple, cross‐cultural measures can be identified and used to gain valuable insight about the viability of business products and services. This implies that researchers might be able to use the same instruments for measurement in different contexts. However, additional research is necessary to firmly support the suitability of the consumer‐related measures across cultures that were the focus of this study.

Practical implications

The findings of this study are particularly useful for multinational companies, which might want to measure and compare the level of their consumers' satisfaction in various countries.

Originality/value

This paper adds to the literature assessing the challenges of cross‐cultural research.

Details

European Journal of Marketing, vol. 39 no. 5/6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510590737
ISSN: 0309-0566

Keywords

  • Customer satisfaction
  • National cultures
  • Buyer‐seller relationships

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 12 December 2019

Rate my firm: cultural differences in service evaluations

Rodoula H. Tsiotsou

Cross-cultural research constitutes a pivotal topic for marketing; however, the literature indicates that there are a few studies analyzing social media reviews from a…

HTML
PDF (787 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Cross-cultural research constitutes a pivotal topic for marketing; however, the literature indicates that there are a few studies analyzing social media reviews from a cross-cultural perspective using cultural proximity (supra-national level) as a proxy of culture. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify cross-cultural differences in service evaluations and specifically, in hotel appraisals among tourists from Central, Eastern (including Post-Soviet States), Northern and Southern Europe.

Design/methodology/approach

A quantitative approach has been taken by studying online user-generated ratings of hotels on Trip Advisor. In total, 1,055 reviews of five hotels in Greece were used for the study.

Findings

Multivariate analysis of variance and analysis of variances results confirm cultural differences in overall service evaluations and attributes (value, location, sleeping quality, rooms, cleanliness and service) of tourists from various European regions. Specifically, Eastern Europeans uploaded more reviews than any other European group, whereas Northern Europeans were more generous in their appraisals than Eastern, Southern and Central Europeans.

Practical implications

The results of the study could be used for segmentation purposes of the European tourism market and for recognizing, which aspects of their services need to be improved based on the segments they serve. Moreover, managers should encourage Northern and Eastern Europeans to upload their reviews as both groups are more generous in their evaluations. Moreover, the findings are useful to marketers of other services.

Originality/value

To the author’s knowledge, this is the first study that examines cross-cultural differences in hotel appraisals from a supra-national perspective including developed (Northern and Western Europe), developing (Southern Europe) and emerging tourism markets (Eastern Europe).

Details

Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 33 no. 7
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2018-0358
ISSN: 0887-6045

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Hospitality
  • Tourism
  • Social media
  • Cultural proximity
  • Supra-national culture
  • User-generated reviews
  • Eastern Europe

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 26 April 2011

Comparative cross‐cultural service quality: an assessment of research methodology

Miguel Morales and Riadh Ladhari

The purpose of this paper is to examine the methodological approaches adopted in cross‐cultural service quality (CCSQ) research and the extent to which these approaches…

HTML
PDF (166 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the methodological approaches adopted in cross‐cultural service quality (CCSQ) research and the extent to which these approaches have adhered to the general principles of established cross‐cultural research methodology.

Design/methodology/approach

A search was conducted to identify CCSQ papers published between 1995 and 2009. The authors searched four well‐known online databases: ABI Inform (Proquest Direct), Emerald Library, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. This search identified 40 studies, which were examined according to three broad groups of methodological issues: research design, instrumentation and data collection, and data analysis and measurement.

Findings

Despite the acknowledged contributions that these selected studies have made to the services‐marketing field, it is evident from this review that researchers have frequently overlooked many important aspects of cross‐cultural research methodology. These methodological deficiencies are discussed and various remedies are suggested.

Originality/value

There has been a growing research interest in comparative cross‐cultural service‐quality in recent decades. As this relatively new branch of service‐quality research becomes more prominent, it seems opportune to examine the methodological approaches adopted in these studies and the extent to which these approaches have adhered to the general principles of established cross‐cultural research methodology. This is the first work to examine such a large number of CCSQ studies.

Details

Journal of Service Management, vol. 22 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111124244
ISSN: 1757-5818

Keywords

  • Data analysis
  • Research work
  • Serials
  • Cross‐cultural studies
  • Customer services quality

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • Last week (27)
  • Last month (122)
  • Last 3 months (393)
  • Last 6 months (734)
  • Last 12 months (1441)
  • All dates (11891)
Content type
  • Article (10203)
  • Book part (992)
  • Earlycite article (653)
  • Case study (42)
  • Expert briefing (1)
1 – 10 of over 11000
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here