Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 5 of 5
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 August 2005

The effectiveness of a single day's training in changing attitudes and practice among professionals ‐ a pilot study

Karen D'Silva, Tim Calton and Conor Duggan

We conducted a pilot study to investigate the impact of a single day's training, the purpose of which was to disseminate good practice, by asking delegates to complete a…

HTML
PDF (293 KB)

Abstract

We conducted a pilot study to investigate the impact of a single day's training, the purpose of which was to disseminate good practice, by asking delegates to complete a questionnaire, six months after attending the day. The completion rate was 56%. Our results suggested only a modest effect on practice, 54% of respondents reporting a change in at least one of the five domains of practice asked about. The question arises of whether this type of training is the most effective way of disseminating good practice.

Details

The British Journal of Forensic Practice, vol. 7 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200500015
ISSN: 1463-6646

Keywords

  • Staff training
  • Forensic
  • Mental health

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 5 April 2013

Clinical Topics in Personality Disorder

Simon McArdle

HTML

Abstract

Details

Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, vol. 34 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09641861311330509
ISSN: 0964-1866

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 August 2005

Editorial

David Crighton and Graham Towl

HTML
PDF (154 KB)

Abstract

Details

The British Journal of Forensic Practice, vol. 7 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200500014
ISSN: 1463-6646

Content available
Article
Publication date: 4 March 2019

Changing agents of change in neoliberally framed organizations

Sheeba Asirvatham and Maria Humphries

This paper aims to invite reflection and action among scholars of gender in management to the shaping and meeting of commitments to universal justice.

HTML
PDF (159 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to invite reflection and action among scholars of gender in management to the shaping and meeting of commitments to universal justice.

Design/methodology/approach

In total, 12 women employed as senior scholars in public universities in Aotearoa New Zealand were invited to discuss their career experiences. An observed disjuncture between radical feminist analyses of their career experiences and their liberal feminist responses to issues arising for them prompted reflection on a wider disjuncture in the shaping of justice wherever neoliberal directives prevail, generating this paper’s activist call to integrity between analyses and practice among scholars as agents of change.

Findings

Implications drawn from the conversations with participants vindicated earlier critiques of diversity management under the conditions of neoliberalism when accommodating damaging social outcomes and systemic compliance is morally compromising.

Originality/value

Exploring accommodation of system preserving career strategies of scholars claiming commitment to justice is an evocative and original call to scholarly activism.

Details

Gender in Management: An International Journal, vol. 34 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2018-0032
ISSN: 1754-2413

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Human resource management
  • Globalization
  • Activism
  • Change management

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 9 March 2012

Older people's views of support services in response to elder abuse in communities across Ireland

Emer Begley, Marita O'Brien, Janet Carter Anand, Campbell Killick and Brian Taylor

This paper seeks to present findings from the first all‐Ireland study that consulted older people on their perceptions of interventions and services to support people…

HTML
PDF (92 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper seeks to present findings from the first all‐Ireland study that consulted older people on their perceptions of interventions and services to support people experiencing abuse.

Design/methodology/approach

Utilising a grounded theory approach, 58 people aged 65 years and over took part in focus groups across Ireland. Four peer‐researchers were also trained to assist in recruitment, data collection, analysis, and dissemination.

Findings

Participants identified preventative community‐based approaches and peer supports as important mechanisms to support people experiencing, and being at risk of, elder abuse. Choices regarding care provision and housing, as well as opportunities for engagement in community activities where they can discuss issues with others, were identified as ways to prevent abuse.

Originality/value

The development of elder abuse services has traditionally been defined from the perspective of policy makers and professionals. This study looked at the perspective of the end‐users of such services for the first time. The research also gave an active role to older people in the research process. The policy implication of the findings from this research is that enhanced attention and resources should be directed to community activities that enable older people to share their concerns informally thereby gaining confidence to seek more formal interventions when necessary.

Details

Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, vol. 13 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14717791211213616
ISSN: 1471-7794

Keywords

  • Elder abuse
  • Elder care
  • Support services
  • Older people
  • Peer‐research

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (5)
Content type
  • Article (5)
1 – 5 of 5
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here