Search results
1 – 2 of 2Claes Alvstam, Inge Ivarsson and Bent Petersen
The hallmark of today’s global value chains (GVCs), still dominated by multinationals from advanced economies, is a sophisticated international division of labor based on…
Abstract
Purpose
The hallmark of today’s global value chains (GVCs), still dominated by multinationals from advanced economies, is a sophisticated international division of labor based on scale economies and prevailing factor endowment differences between countries. However, GVCs led by multinationals from large emerging economies may be configured on the basis of considerations that supplement factor cost efficiencies, namely, those of societal objectives as formulated by political actors in the home country. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to examine the implications of political and socio-economic factors on GVC configuration of multinational firms.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper provides an in-depth case study of a leading Chinese car manufacturer, Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (ZGH) and its value-chain configuration, with a special focus on the acquisition of Volvo Car Corporation.
Findings
The authors show how ZGH’s configuration of its GVC, including that of acquired Volvo Car Corporation, takes place in symbiosis with political actors. The advantages and disadvantages of this symbiosis are highlighted.
Research limitations/implications
The study focuses on GVC configuration of one company, ZGH, in one industry, the automotive industry, in one emerging economy. The external validity of the study may therefore be limited. Furthermore, the focus is on the geographical/locational configuration of GVCs and ignores the ownership aspects.
Originality/value
The paper provides novel empirical evidence to better understand GVC configuration of multinational firms from emerging economies.
Details
Keywords
Jan-Erik Vahlne, Inge Ivarsson and Claes G. Alvstam
This paper aims to contribute to the debate concerning the asserted end of the globalization process.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to contribute to the debate concerning the asserted end of the globalization process.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper is a description of the evolution of all Swedish MNEs, the 50 largest companies and the ten truly global MNEs, building on data compiled by the authors, mainly from annual reports.
Findings
The largest Swedish MNEs have continued to globalize and have at the same time improved their financial performance during the period of study, 2010-2016.
Practical implications
The proposition that multinationals are heading home cannot be confirmed in the Swedish case. There is therefore a need to compare Swedish experiences with other national examples to better generalize the findings.
Social implications
The political decisions regarding external trade and foreign direct investment should support continuous liberalization and facilitation of cross-border economic interaction.
Originality/value
As Swedish MNEs are more globalized than the average in advanced economies, this study offers insight into the contemporary internationalization process.
Details