Search results

The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the student managed investment fund at the School of Business, University of Connecticut.

The authors trace the history and growth of the fund and identify the special features and dimensions that have contributed to its success.

The operation of the fund is a constantly evolving program and the authors discuss the important changes and improvements made in the program since its inception in the early 2000s in response to growth in the number of finance majors, new career opportunities in the field of investments and most importantly, the strength of capital markets and the development of new instruments in the capital markets. The authors also discuss the common features of over 300 student funds in the USA. The authors close with a discussion of the limitations and constraints the fund advisors at, and possibly, at other schools, face in the management and administration of the fund, and also what developments and adjustments the authors expect to see in these funds in the future.

The authors combine extensive analyses of fund history and performance. The authors also provide some suggestions for the future direction and priorities for student funds.

This study identifies the factors responsible for obtaining price premium on privately placed equity in a developing market.

We examine a unique data set of a special case of private placement of equity, Qualified Institutional Placement (QIP) in India purchased at a premium. The study analyzed 188 equity issues offered between September 2006 and December 2014. On average, we find that QIP issues received a price premium of 4.38%. The study employed binary probit and ordinary least square regression models to analyze the probability and magnitude of the premium.

The study attributes the price premium of QIP to certification effect through group affiliation, signaling through promoters' ownership and monitoring effect through existing institutional investors. These factors influence the probability of premium for QIP issues. However, group affiliation and institutional ownership do not significantly influence the magnitude of the premium.

The private placement of equity is usually offered at a discount. Our findings contribute to the existing literature by evaluating the premium obtained on private placement as a unique scenario in emerging market supported through certification hypothesis, monitoring hypothesis and signaling.

This paper presents new evidence on the market value of voting rights during a proxy contest. It tests the hypothesis that the positive announcement period abnormal returns associated with proxy contests may in part be attributed to the incremental value of the voting right. Investigation of board‐seat and issue contests reveals that the announcement period positive returns and the ex‐record day negative returns are higher for board‐seat than for issue contests. For board‐seat contests, the announcement period price increase and the ex‐record day price decrease are larger under cumulative voting than under non‐ cumulative voting. The evidence is consistent with the notion that the increased demand for voting shares during a proxy contest enhances the voting premium and that the effect is proportional to the incremental voting power. The ex‐record day evidence reinforces this argument.

Olympia and York (O&Y), the world′s largest privately held real estate developer, filed for bankruptcy in Canada, the US and the UK in May 1992. The study of O&Y′s impact on banks′ financial performance is important because its financial difficulties affected the banking industry significantly. Unlike studies testing how major lenders′ problems affect other US banks′ stock prices, the study is novel in that it tests how a major borrower′s problems affect both US and foreign banks′ stock prices. Analyses the reactions of US and foreign bank stocks and of O&Y′s bonds to its crisis; the capital market′s response is strongly negative. O&Y′s distress was a major event that signalled the real estate recession and investors′ concerns over the banking sector′s substantial exposure to non‐performing real estate loans. Its creditors applied increasing pressure on its management to disclose more financial information, to renegotiate loans, and eventually, to file for bankruptcy.

This paper aims to provide organizations with a new tool to make decisions related to a facility (building) selection process. Traditionally, value engineering (VE) applies the Value = Function/Cost formula to evaluate the worth of a product. In this paper, the VE-based facility-selection approach is proposed, where the cost of a facility is expressed in net present value (NPV) as it contains the net expense of purchasing or leasing a building as well as the time value of money. Also, a method of quantifying functions and involved risks of different facility choices is proposed.

The framework of the VE-based facility-selection process is broken down into three steps: preparation, calculation/analysis and assessment. In the latter part of this paper, the authors share a sample analysis by illustrating the analysis and decision-making process when three hypothetical facility-selection options are available.

The sample analysis indicates that companies can get the lowest cost and risk while improving their functions to achieve the highest value by using the modified VE formula to drive an optimal option for company’s business expansion and facility-selection process.

This paper provides organizations with a strategic system and process to select proper facilities or buildings for business expansion. The VE approach suggested in this study can allow facility/real estate portfolio decision-makers to analyze financial and functional aspects of the facility at the same time and obtain the value coefficient when they choose a new facility from different options. Finally, they can select the best option, which has the highest value coefficient, given financial and functional considerations.