Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 4 of 4
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 8 August 2016

Exploring academics’ approaches to managing team assessment

Naomi Augar, Carolyn J Woodley, Despina Whitefield and Maxwell Winchester

The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of academics’ approaches to managing team assessment at an Australian University with a view to informing policy…

HTML
PDF (123 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of academics’ approaches to managing team assessment at an Australian University with a view to informing policy development and assessment design.

Design/methodology/approach

The research was conducted using a single exploratory case study approach focussing on the team assessment approach of academics teaching in two colleges at an Australian University. A desktop audit of publicly available assessment policy from 38 Australian universities was conducted alongside a review of relevant college subject guides. The findings of this review framed a subsequent focus group and online survey of academic staff.

Findings

Results suggest that staff have adopted highly diverse and idiosyncratic approaches to team assessment and have mixed views about varied approaches to managing and assessing teamwork. Findings identify a need for explicit guidance and professional development on designing, managing and grading team assessments. Institutional limits and criteria should be introduced to ensure a whole-of-course approach to developing teamwork skills and ensure students are not burdened with an excessive number of team assessment tasks in a degree.

Research limitations/implications

The paper reports results from an exploratory case study at a single Australian University. As such, the results are not generalizable.

Practical implications

The findings could inform guidelines, policies or support resources for designing team assessment tasks.

Originality/value

The research explores a challenging area for academics: team assessment, which the research indicates is not currently adequately managed through university policy and procedure. The findings highlight options for universities to consider when developing policies and procedures to manage team assessment. The study also provides recommendations for academics to consider when developing and managing team assessment.

Details

International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 30 no. 6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2015-0087
ISSN: 0951-354X

Keywords

  • Assessment policy
  • Assessment guidelines
  • Graduate capabilities
  • Managing teamwork
  • Team assessment

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 10 August 2015

Technology mentors: enablers of ICT uptake in Australian small business

Carolyn J Woodley, Stephen Burgess, Rafael Paguio and Scott Bingley

The purpose of this paper is to report on the innovative employment of students as technology mentors as part of a Blended Learning Program (BLP) that supported a group of…

HTML
PDF (134 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to report on the innovative employment of students as technology mentors as part of a Blended Learning Program (BLP) that supported a group of owner-managers of small businesses to adopt appropriate information and communication technologies (ICT) to enhance their work practices.

Design/methodology/approach

This discussion uses various evaluations undertaken throughout the project to examine why the technology mentor role is vital in supporting small businesses to develop digital literacies. The participants’ self-reporting of their ICT skills as well as their progress in using ICT was also assessed by technology mentors in the course of the program and reported in mentor reflections. Academic staff also evaluated the performances of technology mentors in relation to each business.

Findings

Participants in the BLP pilot program singled out the technology mentors as being essential in promoting their uptake of ICT and in their ability to use specific technologies at work.

Research limitations/implications

Findings are based on a pilot program involving six learners and two technology mentors. While this is a statistically insignificant number of evaluations, both the findings and the model of the BLP remain of interest. This model has the capacity to address a long-standing and global challenge to support small businesses in the use of ICT. A scaled up version of the program is required to validate the findings.

Practical implications

In the final evaluation, participants all self-assessed as having increased ICT knowledge and skills. They provided specific examples of how they now use ICT. The BLP could be taken up by local and state governments who periodically attempt to support small businesses in the uptake of technologies. The BLP could also be applied to vocational education students in business, information technologies or information systems. As well as supporting small businesses to adopt ICT, this model also provides an important alternative to resource-intensive work-placement programs that are designed to develop students’ employability skills through work-integrated learning.

Originality/value

Less effective attempts to support small businesses often involve face-to-face training for unrealistic periods of time that foreground technology rather than real world, useful and relevant outcomes (IBSA, 2013). This BLP successfully supported owner operators of small businesses to identify, apply and evaluate a range of software applications (“apps”) and online programs to enhance their work practices.

Details

Education + Training, vol. 57 no. 6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2014-0095
ISSN: 0040-0912

Keywords

  • Work-integrated learning
  • Small business
  • Technology mentors
  • Work-based mentoring
  • Technology mentoring for small businesses

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 29 July 2014

Wadawurrung Dya Baap Ngobeeyt: teaching spatial mapping technologies

Carolyn J. Woodley, Sean Fagan and Sue Marshall

Aboriginal communities in Australia must have mapping information and technology to effectively and independently administer their land holdings and to define, evidence…

HTML
PDF (793 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Aboriginal communities in Australia must have mapping information and technology to effectively and independently administer their land holdings and to define, evidence and thus protect their community and cultural identity. The purpose of this paper is to report on a pilot project that developed a customisable education programme to support Indigenous communities in the uptake of spatial mapping technologies to protect and manage cultural heritage in Victoria, Australia.

Design/methodology/approach

A training programme to support Wadawurrung capabilities in spatial mapping technologies was developed, delivered and evaluated. Concurrently, the system's database was indigenised by Wadawurrung cultural heritage workers. Types and numbers of culturally significant sites mapped using the technologies were collated. The impact of the training and technologies for students and the Wadawurrung community was gauged through participation levels and evaluations. The approach to indigenous spatial mapping projects is informed by postcolonial theories interrogating neo-colonialist cartographic practices.

Findings

Indigenous communities need to be resourced in the uptake of spatial mapping technologies and if universities are going to be involved in co-developing positive learning experiences that encourage the uptake of the technologies, they must have appropriate and respectful relationships with Aboriginal communities. Training programmes need to accommodate learners with diverse educational experiences and technological wherewithal.

Research limitations/implications

Findings from the training evaluations are based on a small number of participants; however, they seem to be supported by literature.

Practical implications

The education model developed is customisable for any Indigenous community in Australia.

Social implications

The social and political importance of spatial mapping technologies for Indigenous Australians is evident as is the need for educational providers to have appropriate and respectful relationships with Aboriginal communities to co-develop positive learning experiences that encourage the uptake of the technologies.

Originality/value

The Wadawurrung Dya Baap Ngobeeyt Cultural Heritage Mapping and Management Project developed practical strategies to build community capacity in Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management and Protection. The educational programme developed supported learners to use technologies in cultural heritage management. Data were collected using community-developed fields for inclusion and culturally appropriate encryption of data.

Details

Campus-Wide Information Systems, vol. 31 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CWIS-10-2013-0059
ISSN: 1065-0741

Keywords

  • Information management
  • Community development
  • Aboriginal cultural heritage
  • Aboriginal culture
  • Spatial mapping technologies

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 28 June 2011

EPortfolios, professional development and employability: some student perceptions

Carolyn Woodley and Rob Sims

The purpose of this study is to explore business students' views about using ePortfolios at Victoria University (VU) in Melbourne. It also examines the extent to which…

HTML
PDF (77 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore business students' views about using ePortfolios at Victoria University (VU) in Melbourne. It also examines the extent to which students present ePortfolios to prospective employers in applying for jobs.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper draws on the literature on ePortfolio use and the role of ePortfolios in the recruitment process together with results from an online survey of Professional Development students about the use of ePortfolios and the PebblePad platform.

Findings

An analysis of online responses examines student views about the usefulness of ePortfolios, the PebblePad platform, and the relevance of an ePortfolio assessment task. The findings suggest that few students use or expect to use ePortfolios beyond the assessment requirements and highlight students' polarised views about the usefulness of PebblePad.

Research limitations/implications

VU's Business Faculty needs to adopt a whole‐of‐course approach to embedding ePortfolios in the curriculum.

Practical implications

At VU, ePortfolios are promoted to students as a personal learning system and as a creative means of communicating their employability skills. The findings suggest a need to review how ePortfolios are used, promoted and assessed in VU's programs.

Originality/value

EPortfolios offer a structured, digital space where students can present evidence of employability skills and reflective capacity. While VU's Business students develop an ePortfolio to showcase their skills in one mandatory subject, ePortfolios must be better promoted as offering a medium for students to develop, store, and creatively present themselves to potential employers in a whole‐of‐course approach.

Details

Campus-Wide Information Systems, vol. 28 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741111145698
ISSN: 1065-0741

Keywords

  • ePortfolios
  • Employability
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional education
  • Students
  • Australia

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (4)
Content type
  • Article (4)
1 – 4 of 4
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here