Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 4 of 4
To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 10 April 2019

Inference in Conditional Moment Restriction Models When there is Selection Due to Stratification

Antonio Cosma, Andreï V. Kostyrka and Gautam Tripathi

We show how to use a smoothed empirical likelihood approach to conduct efficient semiparametric inference in models characterized as conditional moment equalities when…

HTML
PDF (221 KB)
EPUB (1 MB)

Abstract

We show how to use a smoothed empirical likelihood approach to conduct efficient semiparametric inference in models characterized as conditional moment equalities when data are collected by variable probability sampling. Results from a simulation experiment suggest that the smoothed empirical likelihood based estimator can estimate the model parameters very well in small to moderately sized stratified samples.

Details

The Econometrics of Complex Survey Data
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-905320190000039010
ISBN: 978-1-78756-726-9

Keywords

  • Conditional moment models
  • smoothed empirical likelihood
  • stratification
  • variable probability sampling
  • endogenous and exogenous stratification
  • generalized method of moments

To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 10 April 2019

Prelims

HTML
PDF (193 KB)
EPUB (181 KB)

Abstract

Details

The Econometrics of Complex Survey Data
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-905320190000039005
ISBN: 978-1-78756-726-9

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 18 November 2019

Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure: EU Directive 95/2014 and sustainability reporting practices based on empirical evidence from Italy

Federica Doni, Silvio Bianchi Martini, Antonio Corvino and Michela Mazzoni

The recent European Union Directive 95/2014 enforced a radical shift from voluntary to mandatory disclosure of non-financial information. Given radical changes in…

HTML
PDF (333 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The recent European Union Directive 95/2014 enforced a radical shift from voluntary to mandatory disclosure of non-financial information. Given radical changes in reporting practices, there is an urgent need to assess the firms’ attitude to disclose non-financial information regarding the new requirement. This paper aims to investigate whether the quantity and quality of non-financial information, voluntarily disclosed in the years before the directive came into force, were linked to the level of compliance.

Design/methodology/approach

Selecting a sample of 60 Italian companies from the obliged entities, the authors carried out a manual content analysis on corporate reports and developed some research hypotheses to explore if their sustainability practices can affect non-financial disclosures required by the Italian adoption of the European directive (i.e. Legislative Decree 254/2016).

Findings

Evidence showed that prior skills and competencies in non-financial reporting made a significant contribution especially regarding to the presence of business model, but further efforts are expected to improve the quality of non-financial reports.

Practical implications

This study yields an initial assessment of the implementation of the European directive in Italy. It may, therefore, help policymakers to identify ways to improve the harmonization of reporting practices. Preparers can also be supported in choosing different positioning of reporting on non-financial information.

Originality/value

This research provides interesting insights into the ex ante and ex post adoption of the European directive by investigating how Italian companies are reacting to regulatory and institutional requirements. One of the main problems remains the lack of a shared understanding of the term “non-financial”, which can make the communication process difficult and unclear.

Details

Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 28 no. 5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2018-0423
ISSN: 2049-372X

Keywords

  • Italian companies
  • Sustainability
  • Business model
  • Regulator
  • Mandatory reporting
  • Non-financial disclosure

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 29 November 2019

In search of legitimacy: a semiotic analysis of business model disclosure practices

Patrizia Di Tullio, Diego Valentinetti, Christian Nielsen and Michele Antonio Rea

This paper aims to investigate how firms disclose the presentation and content of business model (BM) information in corporate reports to manage their legitimacy in…

HTML
PDF (264 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate how firms disclose the presentation and content of business model (BM) information in corporate reports to manage their legitimacy in response to European Directive 2014/95.

Design/methodology/approach

Legitimacy theory is used to identify disclosure strategies pursued by firms in reaction to the new regulation. To understand how firms adopt these strategic responses, semiotic analysis is applied to a sample of European companies’ reports through Crowther’s (2012) framework, which is based on a mechanism of binary oppositions.

Findings

Half of the sample strategically choose to comply with the European Union (EU) Directive regarding BM information through the use of non-accounting language, figures, and diagrams. Other firms did not disclose any substantive information but managed the impression of compliance with the regulation, while the remainder of the sample dismissed the regulation altogether.

Research limitations/implications

This study demonstrates how organisations use the disclosure of BM information in their corporate reports to control their legitimacy. The results support the idea that firms can acquire legitimacy by complying with the law or giving the impression of compliance with the regulation. This study provides evidence on the first-time adoption of the EU Directive, and therefore, future research can enlarge the sample and conduct the analysis over a broader time frame.

Practical implications

A more precise indication of the EU Directive regarding “where” firms should report BM information, “how” the description of a BM should refer to the environmental, social, governance (ESG) factors, and a set of performance measures to track the evolution of a company’s BM overtime is needed.

Originality/value

While there has been a notable amount of research that has applied content analysis methodologies to investigate the thematic and syntactic aspects of BM disclosure in corporate reports, only a few studies have investigated BM disclosures in relation to the EU Directive. Furthermore, the application of semiotic analysis extends beyond traditional content analysis methodologies because it considers the structure of the story at many levels, thus developing a more complete textual picture of how BMs are described, allowing an analysis of the reasons behind the disclosure strategies pursued by firms.

Details

Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 28 no. 5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2019-0449
ISSN: 2049-372X

Keywords

  • Business model
  • Non-financial information
  • Legitimacy theory
  • European Directive 2014/95
  • Semiotic analysis

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (4)
Content type
  • Article (2)
  • Book part (2)
1 – 4 of 4
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here