Search results
1 – 2 of 2
This study aims to explore the moderating effects of strategy on the relationship between working capital management (WCM) and profitability.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the moderating effects of strategy on the relationship between working capital management (WCM) and profitability.
Design/methodology/approach
A data sample of 72,444 firm-year observations of US-listed firms during 2000–2020 was used. The research hypotheses were tested using a panel regression analysis and an appropriate research instrument that signifies a firm’s strategic positioning.
Findings
The prospecting (defending) strategy has a decreasing (increasing) moderating effect on the relationship between WCM and profitability. The empirical findings are not affected by the level of earnings management, the presence of motives to meet earnings targets or the intensity of unreported intangible assets. Additionally, the reported empirical results remain robust within the context of propensity score matching regression analysis, in the presence of nonlinear effects of WCM on profitability, when alternative measures of WCM are used, and between firms with an increase or decrease in future profitability or different levels of efficiency on net WCM investments.
Research limitations/implications
This study may stimulate future research exploring the moderating effects of various variables on the relationship between WCM and operating performance.
Practical implications
The findings highlight the importance of strategy for improving the performance evaluation of WCM policies and the prediction accuracy of the consequences of a strategy on short-term operating performance.
Originality/value
Prior empirical research has documented either a negative or positive relationship between WCM and profitability, which implies the presence of moderating effects of various factors. This study provides empirical evidence of the moderating effects of strategy on the relationship between WCM and profitability.
Details
Keywords
Abdulkareem Salameh Awwad, Abdel Latef Anouze and Elizabeth A. Cudney
This study aims to investigate and test the impact of competitive priorities, in terms of quality, speed, dependability, flexibility, cost and patient engagement, on patient…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate and test the impact of competitive priorities, in terms of quality, speed, dependability, flexibility, cost and patient engagement, on patient satisfaction with healthcare services. It considers patients’ rather than managers’ points of view to collect responses about competitive priorities.
Design/methodology/approach
This research employed a cross-sectional survey design to analyze a sample of customers through an empirical study of 488 patients in Qatar’s healthcare service context.
Findings
The confirmatory factor analysis results show that competitive priorities and engagement positively and significantly impact patient satisfaction.
Research limitations/implications
Researchers can use this methodology to explore the role of competitive priorities in different service contexts and sectors. The researchers conducted the study in Qatar; therefore, the results are not generalizable to all healthcare sectors. However, regardless of geographic location, the research approach can be used in healthcare.
Practical implications
Managers can employ the developed scales to diagnose competitive priorities and improve customer service experiences.
Originality/value
The paper is original as it suggests using competitive priorities as a measurement tool for predicting patient satisfaction compared to prior research that mostly measured competitive priorities based on internal perspectives (managers’ perspectives). Further, this paper is original because it depends on the external perspective (customers’ perspective) for the competitive priorities for measuring patient satisfaction.
Details