To read this content please select one of the options below:

Joined‐up Rationing? An Analysis of Priority Setting in Health and Social Care Commissioning

Iestyn Williams (Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK)
Helen Dickinson (Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK)
Suzanne Robinson (Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK)

Journal of Integrated Care

ISSN: 1476-9018

Article publication date: 21 February 2011

275

Abstract

Joint commissioning is an important part of the current health and social care context and will continue to be crucial in the future. An essential component of any commissioning process is priority setting, and this paper begins to explore the idea of integrated priority setting as a key element of health and social care commissioning. After setting out the key terminology in this area and the main priority‐setting processes for health and social care, the paper describes a number of barriers that might be encountered in integrated priority setting. We argue that there are significant barriers in financing, accessibility, evidence and politics, and it is important that such barriers are acknowledged if priority setting is to become a component of joint commissioning. While these barriers are not insurmountable, the solution lies in engagement with a range of stakeholders, rather than simply a technical process.

Keywords

Citation

Williams, I., Dickinson, H. and Robinson, S. (2011), "Joined‐up Rationing? An Analysis of Priority Setting in Health and Social Care Commissioning", Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.5042/jic.2011.0030

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles