An evaluation of the implementation of the recovery philosophy in a secure forensic service

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the recovery model or ‘philosophy’ in a secure NHS forensic service. Twenty‐six (86.7%) staff and seventeen (70.8%) mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) were interviewed in Spring 2009 from the rehabilitation and pre‐discharges units in a medium secure forensic service in Kent, UK. Their views on recovery were measured using the Developing Recovery Enhancing Environments Measure (DREEM: Ridgeway & Press, 2001). Staff consistently rated all 24 elements of recovery as more important than the MDOs. Staff also rated the elements of recovery as better implemented, except Intimacy and Sexuality. There was a significant effect of MDOs' forensic history (restriction status and index offence type) on ratings of how well elements of recovery were implemented. Staff and MDOs rated all elements of recovery as at least moderately important (above median value). The implications of the recovery philosophy in forensic mental health services are discussed.

Citation

Corlett, H. and Miles, H. (2010), "An evaluation of the implementation of the recovery philosophy in a secure forensic service", The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 14-25. https://doi.org/10.5042/bjfp.2010.0611

Download as .RIS