To read this content please select one of the options below:

3DCastleBenchy: a process-independent benchmark for additive manufacturing

Alistair Jones (School of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia and School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada)
Janelle Faul (School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada)
Christopher Paul (School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada)
Cael Johnston (Multi Scale Additive Manufacturing Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada)
Michael Benoit (Multi Scale Additive Manufacturing Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada and School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada)

Rapid Prototyping Journal

ISSN: 1355-2546

Article publication date: 29 November 2024

48

Abstract

Purpose

The 3DCastleBenchy has been developed to facilitate wider adoption and use of additive manufacturing benchmarking artefacts which encourage both technical and non-technical users and designers to connect the growing number of technologies available. This tool will help people working with additive manufacturing to gain understanding of the limitations and design rules for each process.

Design/methodology/approach

Benchmarking is of critical importance for additive manufacturing, allowing for comparisons between technology capability, process optimisation and design guidelines. This work presents the 3DCastleBenchy, a design which balances aesthetic appeal and specific, measurable features which can be used for comparing various additive manufacturing processes.

Findings

The benchmark design was fabricated with three fundamentally different metal additive processes, laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED), laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and metal extrusion (MEX). These resulting parts were then analysed, thereby allowing common defects and limitations of each process to be identified, namely, the overhang limitations of traditional L-DED, the cracking that can occur in L-PBF and the deposition tool path artefacts present in MEX.

Originality/value

Existing benchmarks typically focus on either tolerance engineering features, or they are purely artistic/demonstrative pieces. The 3DCastleBenchy has been designed to find a balance between these objectives to facilitate communication of design for additive manufacturing concepts.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support for this work provided through the Mitacs Accelerate program (IT34597), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Undergraduate Student Research Award (NSERC USRA) program (ID 531567656). The authors also express their gratitude to and acknowledge the assistance of Peyman Alimehr and Dr Mihaela Vlasea, both of the Multi Scale Additive Manufacturing (MSAM) Lab at the University of Waterloo, for printing the L-PBF benchmark sample, Dr Sahil Rohila of Rapidia Tech Inc. for printing the MEX benchmark sample and the Space Technology Industry Institute at Swinburne University of Technology for supporting the authors during analysis and writing.

Citation

Jones, A., Faul, J., Paul, C., Johnston, C. and Benoit, M. (2024), "3DCastleBenchy: a process-independent benchmark for additive manufacturing", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0180

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles