To read this content please select one of the options below:

Procurement records compliance, effective risk management and records management performance: Evidence from Ugandan public procuring and disposing entities

Ronald Tumuhairwe (Department of Procurement and Logistics Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda)
Arthur Ahimbisibwe (Department of Procurement and Logistics Management, Makerere University Business School,Kampala, Uganda)

Records Management Journal

ISSN: 0956-5698

Article publication date: 21 March 2016

6233

Abstract

Purpose

Procurement records are critical for the effective execution of the procurement process and have been applied as tools to measure compliance and performance of Public Procuring and Disposing Entities (PDEs) by the regulating authority in Uganda – the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Authority (PPDA). However, the state of records in various Ugandan PDEs depicts poor records management. This situation has adversely affected the effective creation, usage and storage of public procurement records. This compromises the value and importance of records within the procurement process, with most documents being unavailable and unreliable. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between procurement records compliance, effective risk management and records management performance in Ugandan PDEs.

Design/methodology/approach

The study adopted a quantitative research design and used a cross-sectional survey. The researchers developed a questionnaire on the study constructs of procurement records compliance, effective risk management and records management performance using measurement scales derived from previous empirical studies which were modified to suit the current study.

Findings

The results indicate quantitative evidence of significant positive relationships between procurement records compliance, effective risk management and records management performance. Findings also reveal that procurement records compliance and effective risk management are significant predictors of record management performance. The results also suggest that effective risk management has a stronger influence on records management performance than that on procurement records compliance.

Research limitations/implications

The study context is sub-Saharan Africa, and the findings are, therefore, limited to that context; they reflect existing knowledge in other contexts. The use of a standard questionnaire limited the ability to collect views about information outside the questions asked. The study was only cross-sectional, and the study variables could not be analyzed over a long time. Common methods bias remains a potential threat; future studies should use different source data.

Practical implications

Custodians of procurement records, that is, procurement officers, records officers and accounting officers for Ugandan PDEs need to pay special attention to prevailing records laws and policies to minimize risks associated with the poor management of records, as well as improve performance in the management of records creation, storage, retrieval, access and the preservation of vital records.

Originality/value

The study contributes to an important area which has not been given attention in the context of sub-Saharan Africa, especially Uganda where there is a difficulty of linking the value of records management to business processes due to a lack of quantitative evidence.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Levi B. Kabagambe (PhD), Director, Directorate of Quality Assurance, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda, and Joseph M. Ntayi (PhD), Professor, Department of Management Science, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda.

Citation

Tumuhairwe, R. and Ahimbisibwe, A. (2016), "Procurement records compliance, effective risk management and records management performance: Evidence from Ugandan public procuring and disposing entities", Records Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0024

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles