Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
US Republican budget plan would transform Medicare for people under 55 (USA)
Article Type: News and views From: Leadership in Health Services, Volume 24, Issue 3
Edited by Jo Lamb-White
Keywords: Health policy, Elderly healthcare, Healthcare insurance, Medicare
With the federal deficit in their sights, Republicans are preparing a budget proposal that would reportedly trim $4 trillion in government spending over the next decade.
How do they do it? Ending Medicare as we know it is a key part.
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), chairman of the House Budget Committee has developed the plan.
For those who are already 55 and older, there would be no change to Medicare, which covers health care for the elderly. But for everyone else, starting in 2021, the government’s cost for each Medicare beneficiary would be capped (at a level equal to 2012 expenditures plus an annual adjustment, equal to per-capita growth in gross domestic product (GDP) plus 1 percent.)
And those younger people would instead look for private insurance, approved by and subsidized by the government, when they become eligible for Medicare.
Most folks call this kind of government payment a voucher. Although Ryan insisted it is “premium support” – not a voucher. The distinction apparently being that the government money flows directly to an insurer, not the beneficiary.
Ryan argues that competition among these insurers will drive down prices. That is debatable, since Medicare already has very low overheads, and does not have to turn a profit. But while the cost to seniors may not shrink, the cost to the government will grow more slowly than under the existing program.
The Ryan plan for Medicare has been kicking around for a while. Last year, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) did a quick analysis of the proposal and summed it up this way:
“Although the level of expected federal spending and the uncertainty surrounding that spending would decline, enrollees’ spending for health care and the uncertainty surrounding that spending would increase.”
In other words, the risks for future spending increases get shifted to beneficiaries from the federal budget.
Likewise with Medicaid, the federal government’s open-ended payments would be replaced by block grants to the states, with payments capped at 2012 levels plus the same annual adjustment, equal to per-capita GDP growth plus 1 percent (and an adjustment for any changes in Medicaid-eligible population).
Again, the government’s costs would grow more slowly than they would under the current system, but unless overall health care costs also adjust, the costs would merely be shifted.
The Ryan plan reviewed by CBO last year would also make some other changes:
Starting in 2013, cost-sharing rules would change so seniors pay a higher share.
Starting in 2021, the age of eligibility for Medicare would gradually increase, until it reached 67 in 2032.
Poor seniors getting both Medicaid and Medicare would get a fixed contribution towards their Medicare premiums ($6,600 plus the same GDP+1 adjustment).
Medical malpractice rules would be adjusted, including limits on non-economic damages.
For more information: www.healthleadersmedia.com