To read this content please select one of the options below:

Additionalities of innovation voucher schemes: evidence from Lithuania

Jonas Antanavičius (Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Pijus Krūminas (ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania and Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Agne Paliokaite (Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Aleksandr Christenko (Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania and ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Aurinta Elenskė (Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
Ignas Bernotas (Visionary Analytics, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management

ISSN: 2053-4620

Article publication date: 8 October 2024

8

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the impact of innovation vouchers (IVs) by assessing the additionality of IV instruments supporting business-research collaboration in Lithuania.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach relies on studying potential input, behavioural and output additionalities created by IVs. Adopting this perspective, the paper outlines a theoretical framework that indicates the expected contribution of IV schemes and empirically tests its implications. The model is tested by analysing the Inno-vouchers LT instrument implemented in Lithuania in 2012–2014. The study relies on a counterfactual impact evaluation (CIE) and descriptive statistical analysis of survey data of the applicants for IVs.

Findings

The study findings are structured around three types of additionalities. Evidence on input additionality of IV projects provides mixed results, but a significant share of projects included private investment that would not exist without Inno-vouchers LT. Yet, many beneficiaries would also have implemented projects without public support. Both survey data analysis and CIE provide evidence of behavioural additionality, albeit limited. They strongly support the hypothesis that IVs increase companies’ willingness to cooperate with research organisations. Finally, evidence on output additionality is ambiguous. Long-term or indirect output additionality (measured by employment and turnover) seems to be non-existent according to CIE results.

Originality/value

Despite the policy relevance and use of IVs instruments, evidence on the effectiveness is limited. The authors present findings on IVs additionality and suggest avenues for further research.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is based on a study we carried out in 2016–2017 on Inno-vouchers contracted by the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania (Visionary Analytics, 2017). This paper relies on the data and analysis of this study but also expands the calculations. This includes participation in non-IV policy instruments. The study was funded by the European Social Fund, via Priority Axis “Technical assistance for communication and evaluation of the operational programme” and its instrument “Evaluation of EU funds’ investments” No. 12.0.2-CPVA-V-203.

Citation

Antanavičius, J., Krūminas, P., Paliokaite, A., Christenko, A., Elenskė, A. and Bernotas, I. (2024), "Additionalities of innovation voucher schemes: evidence from Lithuania", Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-12-2023-0220

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles