To read this content please select one of the options below:

Social action advertising: motivators and detractors in cause-oriented behaviors

Thomas Mueller (Department of Communication, Appalachian State University College of Fine and Applied Arts, Boone, North Carolina, USA)

Journal of Social Marketing

ISSN: 2042-6763

Article publication date: 10 February 2023

Issue publication date: 7 March 2023

519

Abstract

Purpose

It is an arduous process for corporations to determine if social action advertising is a complementary fit with their respective brands. This study aims to explore opportunities and disadvantages when brands consider cause-related partnerships as part of their overall marketing strategy. There are motivators and detractors related to social actions promoted by brands. It is essential for organizations, institutions and corporations to better understand if, or when, to use advertising that contributes to the social good.

Design/methodology/approach

Phase one of the study was a qualitative analysis conducted through personal interviews. Coded passages from interviews were aggregated into themes, which later defined ten social action advertising measures. The second phase in the study was a quantitative analysis (N = 506) that tested consumer involvement with the social action advertisement “You Love Me.” The spot was designed for the Dr. Dre Beats brand, in response to the George Floyd murder in 2020.

Findings

Brands need to carefully examine their own histories, political associations and concern for all consumer segments, prior to evoking social change. Differentiations arising from political views and gender identity are discussed. Regressions indicate “social ads that use stereotypes” was the key significant predictor of emotional involvement. Consumers feeling “respected and represented in social action ads” was the key significant predictor of fact-based cognitive involvement. “Social action ads distorted through virtue signaling” were 38% more likely to effect brand purchase when consumers viewed the social action ad.

Research limitations/implications

This is a nonfunded research study. Respondents who participated in interviews, and those selected for data collection, were solicited through convenience and judgmental nonprobability sampling. These data are racially and financially biased. Seventy-six percent of respondents in the racial variable were white; 51% stated they were “wealthy and have a lot of assets.” Neither variable is representative of the general population. In the future, researchers should collect a nonbiased stratified probability sample that would more closely reflect the general population and consumer audience.

Originality/value

This paper builds on the recommendations of Farrukh et al. (2021) who call for more published research in the areas of human rights violations and social change. The results of this study represent a cautionary tale. Political dogma within a polarized society has created pressure for chief marketing officers to integrate political values into brand values. The risk of creating adversarial factions has created a risky environment for brand developers and strategists (Mahoney, 2022).

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Disclosure statement: No financial interest or benefit has arisen from the direct application of this research. Three is no conflict of interest to report. This study reports on how sample size was determined, all data exclusions, all manipulations, and all measures in the study. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Citation

Mueller, T. (2023), "Social action advertising: motivators and detractors in cause-oriented behaviors", Journal of Social Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 258-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-07-2022-0161

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles