To read this content please select one of the options below:

Value tensions and actionable knowledge in grassroots innovation: a study of invitational ambiguity and implementation challenges

Gabriella Esposito (Department of Management “Valter Cantino”, University of Turin, Turin, Italy and Academy of Architecture and Urban Studies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.)
Paola De Bernardi (Department of Management “Valter Cantino”, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.)
Alberto Bertello (Department of Management “Valter Cantino”, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.)
Demetris Vrontis (Gnosis: Mediterranean Institute for Management Science, School of Business, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Management Studies, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon and S P Jain School of Global Management – Singapore Campus, Singapore, Singapore.)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 15 November 2024

22

Abstract

Purpose

This research paper explores how grassroots innovation initiatives address and resolve the challenges of translating broad and inviting values such as sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics into practical and actionable structures. This study examines the tensions and difficulties projects face in operationalizing these values, revealing the gap between idealistic goals and real-world implementation. Moreover, this paper analyzes how role expectations and the concept of invitation ambiguity affect top down and bottom up approaches, offering insights for improving mechanisms to support grassroots innovations.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses an exploratory qualitative methodology with an embedded case study design, focusing on the New European Bauhaus (NEB) and its award-winning projects. Data were collected through online self-assessment surveys, secondary data analysis, and semi-structured interviews with project owners and NEB Unit representatives.

Findings

The findings reveal significant challenges in translating broad and inviting values (sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics) into actionable outcomes for grassroots projects. Key issues include the need for clearer role definitions, tailored support, and adaptability. Conflicts between those values and a mismatch between expectations about stakeholders’ contributions highlight the need for designing more flexible and robust frameworks and robust frameworks.

Originality/value

This research explores the effects of invitational ambiguity within grassroots innovation, revealing how broad values ‐ like sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics ‐ are operationalized in real-world settings. By applying collective action theoretical frameworks to the unique case study of NEB projects, this study provides fresh insights into the dynamics between top-down European policies and bottom-up grassroots practices.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the New European Bauhaus Research Team at the Joint Research Center for their invaluable support in providing access to critical information and for facilitating engagement with and dissemination of this research among the finalists of the NEB Prize. Additionally, authors would like to extend their thanks to the research assistants imvoved in this research project for their significant contributions during the preliminary stages of this research.

Citation

Esposito, G., De Bernardi, P., Bertello, A. and Vrontis, D. (2024), "Value tensions and actionable knowledge in grassroots innovation: a study of invitational ambiguity and implementation challenges", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2024-0385

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles