Citation
Chin, T., Del Giudice, M., Di Vaio, A., Fiano, F., Garcia-Perez, A., Paoloni, N. and Magni, D. (2023), "Guest editorial: Unveiling the roles of intellectual capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from moderate innovative countries", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2023-393
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited
Introduction
Following the surge of interest for business scholars in the approach of ecosystem initially proposed by Moore (1993), the novel concept of an entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) coined by Prahalad (2005), as a combination of manifold stakeholders from private and public sectors to generate economic wealth and societal prosperity in a symbiotic manner, has also gained prominence in recent years. Despite some similarities and overlap between the EE and several homologous terms, including the business ecosystem (Moore, 1993), the innovation ecosystem (Adner, 2006) and the knowledge ecosystem (Van der Borgh et al., 2012), the EE has been deemed as a distinctive type of ecosystem in various fields of management. Simply stated, the EE is analogous to the above-mentioned ecosystems in terms of developing business platforms akin to biological systems where all stakeholders have shared sets of technological devices and networking architectures and thereby tightly or loosely interact with one another to create value (Chin et al., 2022). However, the EE differs from the others in its extraordinary emphasis on the roles that governments, policymakers and ecosystem leaders play in stimulating, supporting and nurturing entrepreneurship (Scaringella and Radziwon, 2018; Regele and Neck, 2012).
According to the literature, the leaders’ personality traits, risk-taking orientation, as well as other related entrepreneurial cognitions, attitudes and behaviours, show great significance for the formation and evolution of EEs (Vargas-Vera et al., 2013; Del Giudice et al., 2019; Chin et al., 2020). In turn, environmental dynamism and uncertainty have been identified as critical moderators for shaping the decision-making processes of the entrepreneur, the lead firm and other keystone actors in EEs in performing and sustaining innovation (Cohen and Winn, 2007; Del Giudice et al., 2017). Echoing the above-mentioned vital roles of governments at various levels, civil society has been added as an indispensable part of a new quadruple helix model for innovation in EEs (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2013).
The existing results suggest that the success of EEs is contingent on the complex interacting and networking among stakeholders across various levels of analysis (e.g. national, industrial, organisational and individual levels). This partly implies that the operation and orchestration of such ecosystems entail the possession of diverse knowledge resources and assets as the basis for fostering sufficient innovation capacity to cope with the ever-evolving, intricate relations among actors at the intersections of different cultural and institutional frameworks, as well as their corresponding bureaucratic systems. Following this logic, we thus contend that it is imperative to take into account the dynamic mechanisms of intellectual capital (IC) that characterises the totality of an organisation’s knowledge stocks and resources (Edvinsson and Sullivan, 1996) upon the design, formation and other aspects of EEs.
Prior studies have addressed how the overall and the individual dimensions of IC (e.g. human capital [HC], relational capital [RC] and structural capital [SC]) help convert organisational knowledge into economic value in different contexts and exert varying impacts on corporate ventures, innovations and a variety of other entrepreneurial endeavours (e.g. Hayton, 2005; Khan et al., 2019; Alvino et al., 2021; Di Vaio et al., 2020). Some of these endeavours have linked IC to entrepreneurship from the perspective of knowledge management (KM) (Nicotra et al., 2018; Usai et al., 2018). However, most of them are still at the initial stage of development and have not incorporated the views of IC into understanding the EE domain that involves a wider spectrum of actors beyond the traditional game of entrepreneurship, ranging from entrepreneurs, established firms, suppliers, customers and the like to those in the non-profit sector, such as universities, governments and industrial associations.
Taking together the preceding arguments, we can conclude that there are many research gaps at the confluence of IC, KM and EE. Moreover, given that entrepreneurial firms often act as the main drivers for the growth of emerging economies and less developed regions (Del Giudice et al., 2019; Chin et al., 2020), it seems especially meaningful to investigate relevant issues in moderate innovative countries. This explains the underlying motivation behind this special issue (SI).
Objectives of the special issue
As indicated in the introduction, this SI aims to unveil the various roles of IC as critical knowledge resources to achieve competitiveness in designing and orchestrating different archetypes of EEs or in formulating and promoting innovation-related activities, such as learning and technology transfer in the EE context.
To allow more innovative submissions, this SI encourages authors to build broader, inter-disciplinary theoretical underpinnings, to employ more varieties of methodologies and to undertake multiple levels of analysis through an integrative lens of IC, EE and KM. Fortunately, it is very exciting to see that quite a few fascinating articles were received. After a rigorous review process, ten articles were carefully chosen for publication, which can be classified into four categories based on the research focus discussed, the background setting selected and the methodology used. The main findings and perspectives are summarised below.
An overview of selected articles
Unravelling the various roles of the overall IC and its subdimensions in EEs
The first section contains two articles. Marinelli et al. (2023) adopt an unconventional collective intelligence approach with a two-year, longitudinal single-case study on the Italian EE FermoTech to elucidate the individual effects of three dimensions of IC (i.e. HC, SC and RC) and their interacting mechanisms on the process of forming a top-down, innovation-based EE. Their findings address the intertwining influence of HC and RC on the conduct of various collaborative activities among diverse actors amid the process of forming an EE at both micro- and meso-levels, while SC only occurs at the meso-level. Their unique contribution lies in the application of an orthodox yet more comprehensive approach to crystallise how the three components of IC stimulate the creation of an Italian EE at different stages of development, respectively.
Using a systematic lens to interpret the dynamics of IC in EEs, Grande et al. (2023) propose a novel taxonomy of IC comprising explorative and exploitative enablers as the two main categories. Each category is further divided into three subcategories based on the three dimensions of IC, namely explorative/exploitative HC, explorative/exploitative RC and explorative/exploitative organisational capital (OC). The complex interplays of these enablers are also discussed at length and in depth. Given their research setting as the context of a series of internationally awarded hackathons and associated activities in an entrepreneurial university located in Latin America, they provide valuable first-hand data for scholars, practitioners and policy makers to understand how IC stimulates the occurrence of EEs in a fast-growing, moderate innovative environment.
Systematic reviews for identifying hot topics at the intersection of IC, EE and KM
The second section includes two papers. Chaudhary et al. (2022) first use the academic databases of Google Scholar and Web of Science (WOS) to search a nexus of keywords for several rounds (e.g. KM, IC, HC, SC, OC, corporate entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial orientation and the like); 79 studies are selected after filtering and sorting. Next, they adopt a systematic literature review approach to distil four predominant themes: (1) role of KC in entrepreneurial firms, (2) organisational learning and entrepreneurial orientation, (3) IC and entrepreneurial orientation and (4) absorptive capacity and entrepreneurial orientation. Based on these results, they also develop a theoretical model demonstrating the causations and correlations between IC and entrepreneurial orientation, which provides abundant implications for recognising the crucial role of IC in identifying business opportunities in a highly uncertain business environment.
Paoloni et al. (2023) conduct a structured literature review on controversial topics regarding IC measurement and reporting in different research areas and background contexts. Their main contribution lies in synthesising the theories of agency, stakeholder and legitimacy to specify the strategic use of IC measurement and reporting as a feasible means for firms to reduce information asymmetry and enhance their reputation.
Contingent mechanisms between IC and specific types of EEs
The third section comprises three articles. Canestrino et al. (2023) depart from more human-centric and social-oriented views to conceptualise a relatively abstract term – “humane entrepreneurial ecosystem” (HEE) – by defining it as an “interacting group of actors aiming to pursue economic, social and environmental sustainability”. Based on this novel conceptualisation, they first address the pivotal role of IC in propelling entrepreneurship and orchestrating all actors in HEEs. They then refer to the GLOBE project to conduct a quantitative study examining the impacts of cultural factors on the emergence and development of HEEs in different cultural contexts.
Festa et al. (2023) investigate the significant yet varying impacts of several advanced financial technologies (FinTech), including crowdfunding, mobile payment and blockchain, on forming a distinctive type of FinTech EE in Tunisia. Particularly, they highlight the fact that entrepreneurial education may serve as a fundamental force to enhance the entrepreneurial orientation and IC of young Tunisian entrepreneurs and thereby stimulate the growth of such an EE.
Berné Manero et al. (2023) investigate how a digital tool, namely electronic word of mouth (eWOM), affects managers’ decision-making process that embodies a certain part of IC in Italian hotel EEs. The analysis of structural equation modelling shows that eWOM enables hotel managers to better develop and leverage IC and thereby undertake entrepreneurial activities, such as the conduct of organisational innovations and changes. Given the intensifying digitalisation in the post-pandemic world, their research provides valuable references for practitioners and entrepreneurs to cope with relevant challenges in hotel EEs.
Idiosyncratic links of different IC components to EEs
The fourth section contains three articles. The first two focus on HC. Using a sample of 827 Italian cases over the period 2009–2018, Prencipe et al. (2023) perform a regression analysis to unmask the role of HC as a subcomponent of IC in a distinctive knowledge-intensive EE of university spin-offs in Italy. Theoretically, they build an overarching logical framework incorporating the theories of resource dependence, upper echelons and critical mass from different domains, thus enriching the IC and the EE literature by indicating the cross-disciplinary nature of relevant issues. Their findings on unconventional non-linear influences of gender diversity and nationality diversity on boards of directors imply the imperative to consider the boundary conditions of realising innovation in a specific EE.
Chaudhuri et al. (2023) integrate the resource-based view with the theory of absorptive capacity to empirically test the HC–EE nexus in India, where firms’ digital knowledge capability and innovation capability significantly and positively affect the development of EEs, while technology turbulence moderates these positive relations. Their findings offer fresh and important practical implications for other entrepreneurial firms in emerging economies.
The third article focuses on RC. Duan et al. (2023) explore the intervening impacts of leadership empowerment on the positive associations between RC and firm innovation in Chinese EEs. Their research provides a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of the role of RC as they divide RC into three subdimensions (i.e. trust, reciprocity and transparency) and find nuanced differences in the statistical results. Leadership empowerment positively moderates the links of trust and reciprocity to firm innovation but cannot moderate the transparency–innovation relation.
Conclusion
In summary, the ten articles selected for this SI encompass a variety of themes and subjects at the confluence of IC, EE and KM, which involve the application of multifaceted methodologies and the development of cross-disciplinary theoretical frameworks. The diversity in authorship and affiliation reflects a high level of international collaboration that often can lead to a new way of thinking across cultures. As illustrated above, these articles are classified into four sections. The first section, entitled “Unravelling the various roles of the overall IC and its subdimensions in EEs”, elucidates the indispensable yet varying and ever-changing roles that IC and its subcomponents play in driving the emergence of EEs in different cultural and institutional contexts. The second section, entitled “Systematic reviews for identifying hot topics at the intersection of IC, EE and KM”, draws a more holistic picture for crystallising current trends and future research directions. The third section, entitled “Contingent mechanisms between IC and specific types of EEs”, addresses the contingent mechanisms between specific forms of EEs and IC. The fourth section, entitled “Idiosyncratic links of different IC components to EEs”, characterises the context-specific effects of individual IC components on distinct types of EEs in a diverse environment.
Overall, the ten studies in this SI indeed provide quite a few novel perspectives that can enhance the conceptual clarification of EEs and thereby make sense of the various roles that IC plays in facilitating communication and cooperation among a wide range of stakeholders in the complex, stratified networks of EEs. Synthesising the findings of all articles in this SI, we thus contend that an EE can be characterised by an open, constantly evolving entrepreneurial system with blurred organisational boundaries, intertwining subsystems and intricate networking structures, where plenty of loosely or tightly bound heterogeneous stakeholders, led by the ecosystem leader as an entrepreneur, create and capture economic, social and environmental values together.
We also acknowledge that despite some valuable theoretical and practical implications offered by this SI, the studies about the roles of IC in EEs in moderate innovative countries are still in their nascency. It is believed that there is a need for combining a broader scope of theoretical logic to delve into relevant issues in the future. For instance, while an increasing number of digital infrastructures across geographic locations are being built, it is plausible to witness a new round of surges of digital-driven EEs in the post-pandemic area. The reason is that there will be greater availability and sharing of critical resources, such as data, expertise and the like, among the central actors and stakeholders within various building blocks of EEs, similar to Apple’s iOS. In this vein, new environmental challenges imposed on the entrepreneurs may lie in the sophistication of adopting newly emerged digital technologies to be innovative and competitive, as indicated by Popkova and Sergi’s (2020) recent work that has introduced the concept of “artificial intellectual capital” in the context of Industry 4.0.
In sum, considering the high complexity, ambiguity and variability embedded in the core of EEs, it is expected that a fresh idea of entrepreneurship may arise. It thus requires deeper, more comprehensive investigations or the use of unconventional approaches to more profoundly understand how IC elicits the dynamics of learning, innovation and technology transfer in such an entrepreneurial context.
References
Adner, R. (2006), “Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 No. 4, pp. 98-107.
Alvino, F., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R. and Palladino, R. (2021), “Intellectual capital and sustainable development: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 76-94.
Berné Manero, M.D.C., Moretta Tartaglione, A., Russo, G. and Cavacece, Y. (2023), “The impact of electronic word-of-mouth management in hotel ecosystem: insights about managers’ decision-making process”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 227-256, doi: 10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0201.
Canestrino, R., Magliocca, P., Ćwiklicki, M. and Pawełek, B. (2023), “Toward the emergence of ‘humane’ entrepreneurial ecosystems. Evidence from different cultural contexts”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 177-204, doi: 10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0200.
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, P.D. and Vicentini, F. (2023), “Effects of human capital on entrepreneurial ecosystems in the emerging economy: the mediating role of digital knowledge and innovative capability from India perspective”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 283-305, doi: 10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0177.
Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Farronato, N., Riso, T. and Pironti, M. (2022), “Knowledge management and entrepreneurial orientation. A systematic literature review of intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, forthcoming.
Chin, T., Shi, Y., Rowley, C. and Meng, J. (2020), “A confucian business model canvas in the Asia pacific: a yin-yang harmony cognition to value creation and innovation”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 342-358.
Chin, T., Shi, Y., Singh, S.K., Agbanyo, G.K. and Ferraris, A. (2022), “Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: a dynamic capability of values appropriation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 183, pp. 1-11, 121908.
Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007), “Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 29-49.
Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E.G. and Maggioni, V. (2017), “Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 229-235.
Del Giudice, M., Garcia-Perez, A., Scuotto, V. and Orlando, B. (2019), “Are social enterprises technological innovative? A quantitative analysis on social entrepreneurs in emerging countries”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 148, pp. 1-7, 119704.
Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Hassan, R. and Alvino, F. (2020), “Human resources disclosure in the EU Directive 2014/95/EU perspective: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 257, pp. 1-18, 120509.
Duan, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, S., Wong, C.-S., Yang, M. and Mu, C. (2023), “The moderating effect of leadership empowerment on relational capital and firms’ innovation performance in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: evidence from China”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 306-336, doi: 10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0183.
Edvinsson, L. and Sullivan, P.H. (1996), “Developing a model for managing intellectual capital”, European Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 356-364.
Festa, G., Elbahri, S., Cuomo, M.T., Ossorio, M. and Rossi, M. (2023), “FinTech ecosystem as influencer of young entrepreneurial intentions: empirical findings from Tunisia”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 205-226, doi: 10.1108/JIC-08-2021-0220.
Grande, S., Bertello, A., De Bernardi, P. and Ricciardi, F. (2023), “Enablers of explorative and exploitative intellectual capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 35-69.
Hayton, J.C. (2005), “Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectual capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high‐technology new ventures”, R&D Management, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 137-155.
Khan, A.M., Arafat, M.Y., Raushan, M.A., Khan, M.S., Dwivedi, A.K., Khan, M.M. and Saleem, I. (2019), “Role of intellectual capital in augmenting the start-up intentions of Indians—an analysis using GEM data”, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1-14, 25.
Marinelli, L., Bartoloni, S., Pascucci, F., Gregori, G.L. and Farina Briamonte, M. (2023), “Genesis of an innovation-based entrepreneurial ecosystem: exploring the role of intellectual capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 10-34, doi: 10.1108/JIC-09-2021-0264.
Moore, J.F. (1993), “Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71 No. 3, pp. 75-86.
Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M. and Schillaci, C.E. (2018), “The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 640-673.
Paoloni, P., Modaffari, G., Ricci, F. and Della Corte, G. (2023), “Intellectual capital between measurement and reporting: a structured literature review”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 115-176, doi: 10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0195.
Popkova, E.G. and Sergi, B.S. (2020), “Human capital and AI in industry 4.0. Convergence and divergence in social entrepreneurship in Russia”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 565-581.
Prahalad, C.K. (2005), The Bottom of the Pyramid–Eradicating Poverty through Profits, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2013), The Future of Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Prencipe, A., Boffa, D., Papa, A., Corsi, C. and Mueller, J. (2023), “Unmasking intellectual capital from gender and nationality diversity on university spin-offs’ boards: a study on non-linear effects upon firm innovation”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 257-282, doi: 10.1108/JIC-08-2021-0207.
Regele, M.D. and Neck, H.M. (2012), “The entrepreneurship education subecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity”, Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 25-47.
Scaringella, L. and Radziwon, A. (2018), “Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: old wine in new bottles?”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 136, pp. 59-87.
Usai, A., Scuotto, V., Murray, A., Fiano, F. and Dezi, L. (2018), “Do entrepreneurial knowledge and innovative attitude overcome ‘imperfections’ in the innovation process? Insights from SMEs in the UK and Italy”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 1637-1654.
Van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M. and Romme, A.G.L. (2012), “Value creation by knowledge‐based ecosystems: evidence from a field study”, R&D Management, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 150-169.
Vargas-Vera, M., Nagy, M. and De Pablos, P.O. (2013), “A framework for detecting and removing knowledge overlaps in a collaborative environment: case of study a computer configuration problem”, Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 422-438.
Further reading
Elkington, J. (1994), “Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development”, California Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 90-100.
Acknowledgements
This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72272136).
About the authors
Tachia Chin is a professor at School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology (ZJUT), Hangzhou, China. She was born in Taiwan China. From 2004 to 2014, she had worked as a senior HR/CSR executive for Singapore-invested and Taiwan-invested manufacturing firms in China; she also earned her Ph.D. at Jinan University and completed her post-doc study at Sun Yat-sen University during the same period. With abundant working experience for multinational enterprises, Tachia has switched to an academic career at the end of 2014. She has published more than 100 articles in top English and Chinese journals such as Technological Forecast and Social Change, International Journal of Production Economics, Journal of International Management, International of Human Resource Management and served as a leading guest editor for Asia Pacific Business Review, Journal of Knowledge Management and Career Development International. Now she teaches English/bilingual/Chinese courses of cross-cultural management and leadership at the MBA and EMBA level at several universities. Her research focuses are cross-cultural management, knowledge management, leadership and strategic HRM.
Manlio Del Giudice, Ph.D., is Full Professor of Management at the “Link Campus University”, where he serves as Director of the CERMES Research Centre and Director of Master in Smart PA. He holds a Ph.D in Management at the University of Milano-Bicocca. He developed his academic and scientific career abroad for more than 10 years in a number of worldwide renewed universities (e.g. Grenoble School of Business; University of Twente; United Arab Emirates University; University of Waikato; George Washington University; ESG Management School; Coventry University; Universidad De Murcia; EuroMed Business Institute; University of Nicosia among others). He had been hired as Full Professor in 2018 as one of the 20 youngest professors in Italy among all scientific sectors. Currently, he serves as the Editor in Chief of the Journal of Knowledge Management. He holds key editorial positions and leading guest editor role in a large number of “call for papers” in several international mainstream scientific journals on management. His main research interests deal with knowledge management, technology transfer, innovation and technology management. His scholar profile shows more than 140 peer-reviewed articles, more than 70 of them ranked as “A Class” according to the Italian ANVUR ranking journal list such as MIS Quarterly (4* Elite), Journal of Organizational Behavior (4*), Journal of World Business (4*), Journal of Product Innovation Management (4*), Long Range Planning (3*), IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (3*), Journal of Technology Transfer (3*), Journal of Business Research (3*), R&D Management (3*), Technological Forecasting and Social Change (3*), Production, Planning and Control (3*) and International Marketing Review (3*), alongside 12 international monographs published by Springer, Palgrave Macmillan and Elsevier. His studies had been internationally recognised by significant impact, as evidenced by about 8,000 citations and the H-index (= 47) (at November 2021). He has recently supported the Emerald Publisher’s Department in charge of the Ethical Issues and Investigations on publication malpractices (according to the COPE Ethical Guidelines). Moreover, he has been newly appointed by the Ministry of Education in Italy as one of the five Commissioners for the National Scientific Qualification (ASN) for the field of Management Sciences. He is serving as Expert Evaluator for the Campania Region, for the National Research Council of Norway and for the European Commission in the areas of innovation and technological management and forecasting. His main research interests deal with knowledge management, technology transfer, innovation and technology management.
Assunta Di Vaio, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Business Administration at the University of Naples Parthenope, Italy, where she served as Deputy-Director of the Department of Law (from 2017 to May 2022). Since 2014, she has been serving as Delegate for International Affairs of this Department. Since 2022 (June), she serves as member of Gender Equality Plan (GEP Focal Point) of her university. She is qualified as Full Professor in the same scientific field. Currently, she teaches human resource accounting, sustainable disclosure and reporting and corporate governance of shipping companies. She holds the PhD in Business Administration from Cà Foscari University, Italy. She has also achieved MSc in Service Management, Specialisation in Logistics and Transport at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). She has been visiting researcher at the University College London and University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Her research fields include managerial accounting and management information for the decision-making processes in the public and private sector; performance measurement; sustainable accounting; non-financial disclosure; human resources disclosure; intellectual capital and sustainable business models; UN 2030 Agenda and SDGs; digital transformation and artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. She has high knowledge about systematic literature review. Her research has been published in leading management journals and top tier peer-reviewed journals ABS ranked. She is editorial board member of international journals. She is a peer reviewer for international journals edited by Elsevier, Emerald, Taylor & Francis, MDPI and Springer. She attends as keynote speaker in several international conferencse on SDGs and best practices issues in private and public firms. She serves as member of Italian Academy of Business Administration (AIDEA) and International Association of Maritime Economics (IAME). She is member of Port Performance Research Network (PPRN) (https://pprn.network/). She has been visiting fellow of UCL Quantitative and Applied Spatial Economic Research Laboratory (QASER) in London (UK). She was ranked first in her University for the Business Administration field. Currently, Assunta Di Vaio is the Scientific Director of “Digital transition for Sustainable and Resilient Business Models in the ship-port interface towards the UN 2030 Agenda”. It is a research project funded by Universities and Research Ministry of Italian Government. As well as she is the head of the Blue Shipping & Cruise Lab (BSCLab) at Department of Law – University of Naples “Parthenope” (Italy).
Fabio Fiano received a Ph.D. in Entrepreneurship and Innovation from the Second University of Naples, Italy. He graduated from Second University of Naples with a bachelor’s in Business Administration; he also holds a master’s degree in Management Control and Information Systems from the University of Naples Parthenope, Italy and was formerly Professor of Tourism Management and Territorial Marketing, Business Creation, Corporate Strategy and Governance, Project Financing, Digital Technologies for Business, Healthcare Management, Innovation Management and Strategic Management. His editorial engagement regards the membership of the Editorial Advisory Board and the activities of Ad hoc Reviewer for numerous international journals. He has published articles on prestigious journals (including Small Business Economics, Management Decision, Journal of Knowledge Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Business Process Management Journal, British Food Journal, Journal of Intellectual Capital, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Journal of Business Research, Journal of World Business and International Marketing Review) as well as in international conference proceedings on the following topics: innovation, corporate governance, knowledge management, bankruptcy prediction models, big data, Industry 4.0 and international business.
Alexeis Garcia-Perez is Associate Professor in Cyber Security Management at the Centre for Business in Society of Coventry University and a Visiting Research Scholar at Georgetown University (USA). His original background in computer science was complemented by a PhD in Knowledge Management from Cranfield University. A socio-technical understanding of information systems has enabled Alexeis to focus on the wider challenges of data, information and knowledge management in organisations and society. Alexeis is a Senior Fellow of the UK Higher Education Academy and member of the executive committee of the International Association for Knowledge Management (IAKM). He is also academic member of the Warwickshire Cyber Crime Task and Finish Group in the UK and member of the leadership team of the Special Interest Group on Knowledge Management at the Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) in the USA. He collaborates with the Task Force on Knowledge Management of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in the USA and is a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Knowledge Management. Alexeis has collaborated extensively with key industry players including Siemens, General Electric and the British Railway Industry. He maintains a solid collaboration with the School of Business Administration of the Technical University of Cartagena (Spain). In addition to his leading role at the Research Centre for Business in Society, Alexeis has been the course director for programmes including the MBA Cyber Security at Coventry University.
Niccolò Paoloni is a Ph.D. in Business Administration, Department of Engineering of the RomaTre University. His main research topics are general management, bank–business relationship, company critique and restructuring, female entrepreneurship.
Domitilla Magni is an associate professor at the Faculty of Economics at e-Campus University. She obtained her Ph.D. in “Management, Banking and Commodity Sciences” at Sapienza, University of Rome. She is a Visiting Professor at various top tier universities across the world (e.g. New York University, Montpellier Business School, South-Western University of Finance and Economics, La Salle University). She is adjunct professor at the University of Turin for the class of Management and Business Planning, at Link Campus University for the class of Neuromarketing and at the University of Bergamo for the class of International Business. Her research interests include knowledge management, innovation and technology management and open innovation. She is also part of the Editorial Board for Journal of Intellectual Capital (Emerald), Journal of Knowledge Management (Emerald) and International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital (Inderscience).