To read this content please select one of the options below:

It is a balancing act: understanding the key audit matters disclosure in the context of a developing country

Md. Khokan Bepari (Higher Education Division, Holmes Institute, Brisbane, Australia)
Shamsun Nahar (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)
Mohammad Istiaq Azim (College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia)
Abu Taher Mollik (Canberra Business School, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia)

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change

ISSN: 1832-5912

Article publication date: 10 August 2023

Issue publication date: 27 May 2024

467

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the strategies that auditors in Bangladesh follow in identifying and reporting key audit matters (KAMs). The study also examines the factors affecting auditors’ strategies in the identification and disclosures of KAMs.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors have conducted interviews with audit partners, chief financial officers (CFOs) and regulators involved in KAMs reporting and monitoring. The authors have used the lens of institutional theory of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism and the concept of decoupling.

Findings

Auditors have used a decoupling strategy by identifying and reporting greater number of industry-generic KAMs than that of other countries in an effort to minimize risks and avoid regulatory scrutiny, although they disclose remote risks as KAMs and mask severe problem areas of the client. Because of the principle-based approach of International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 701 and because of the pressure and misunderstanding from the audit committee, auditors report industry-generic items and generic descriptions of KAMs.

Practical implications

The findings have important implications for the standard setters and local and global audit firms for the diffusion of new auditing standards in different jurisdictions. Without the development of audit firm-level capability and the corporate governance environment, changes in standards may not be effective in achieving the objectives of the standards.

Social implications

Although auditors consider that the KAMs reporting requirements provide with opportunities to enhance audit profession’s legitimacy and public trusts, the actual KAMs reporting practices are driven by the market logic, an urge to maintain the status quo with clients and eventual rationalization of the impairment of professional independence.

Originality/value

Given the dearth of prior research on the implementation and diffusion patterns of ISA 701 KAMs reporting, this study fills the gap in the literature. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first known study to examine auditors’ strategic responses to balance among conflicting priorities in reporting KAMs.

Keywords

Citation

Bepari, M.K., Nahar, S., Azim, M.I. and Mollik, A.T. (2024), "It is a balancing act: understanding the key audit matters disclosure in the context of a developing country", Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 459-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2022-0131

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles