To read this content please select one of the options below:

Justifying a financially and socially sustainable pension reform: a comparative study of Finland and France

Niko Väänänen (Finnish Centre for Pensions, Helsinki, Finland)
Jyri Liukko (Finnish Centre for Pensions, Helsinki, Finland)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 27 June 2022

Issue publication date: 23 May 2023

427

Abstract

Purpose

Increasing longevity and lower birth rates put pressure on the sustainability of pension systems. This compels countries to reform pension schemes. Different countries opt for different types of reforms. This article examines the scope of possibilities for a pension reform in two countries with distinct institutional and ideational setup: Finland and France.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors utilise the framework of different modes of justification presented by Boltanski and Thévenot to reveal the reasoning used in pension reform discussions in both countries. The authors study expert reports to analyse how nationally constructed ideas and local institutions frame and shape the different logics and justifications.

Findings

In Finland, the approach to pensions is dominated by industrial and market justifications. The pension system is institutionally separated into two different blocks: one addressing poverty and the other income maintenance. The separation enables the prevalence of these logics and makes it easier to promote reforms that emphasize efficiency and individual responsibility instead of income distribution. The French report is concentrated around civic and domestic dominated justifications by stressing solidarity and the role of pension systems connecting individuals and generations together. Any reform needs to consider these issues.

Originality/value

The article uses a novel research design to study pension reform processes. The article distinguishes the roles that ideas and institutions have in shaping expert reasoning and reform options. The authors show how ideas and institutions form a mutually reinforcing loop which helps to explain path-dependency in pension systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants of the Safe, Adequate and Sustainable Pensions Workshop at the Université Catholique de Louvain (18.9.2020) for insightful comments. Equally, the authors would like to thank the four reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

Citation

Väänänen, N. and Liukko, J. (2023), "Justifying a financially and socially sustainable pension reform: a comparative study of Finland and France", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 43 No. 5/6, pp. 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2022-0091

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles