Towards a critical realism synthesis of configurational and middle-range theorising

Abstract

Purpose

We present configurational theorising as a novel approach to developing middle-range theory in two steps: (1) we illustrate configurational theorising as a new form of supply chain inquiry by connecting its philosophical assumptions with a methodological execution, and (2) we generate new insights underpinning a middle-range theory for supply chain resilience.

Design/methodology/approach

We synthesise information from a range of sources and invoke ‘critical realism” to suggest a five-phase configurational theorising roadmap to develop middle-range theory. We demonstrate this roadmap to explain supply chain resilience by analysing qualitative data from 22 organisations within the Australian food supply chain.

Findings

Coopetition and supply chain collaboration are necessary causal conditions, but they need to combine with either supply chain agility or multi-sourcing strategy to build supply chain resilience. Asymmetrical analyses showed that the simultaneous absence of supply chain collaboration, supply chain agility and multi-sourcing results in low supply chain resilience, but coopetition was indifferent to low supply chain resilience. Similarly, high supply chain resilience is possible with the non-presence of supply chain agility and multi-sourcing.

Research limitations/implications

The configurational middle-range theorising roadmap presented and empirically tested in this paper constitutes a substantial advancement to both theory and the methodological domain.

Originality/value

This is the first attempt at developing a middle-range theory for supply chains by explicitly drawing on configurational theorising.

Citation

Malik, M. and Ali, I. (2024), "Towards a critical realism synthesis of configurational and middle-range theorising", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 54 No. 7/8, pp. 730-754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2023-0185