To read this content please select one of the options below:

Redesigning global supply chains during compounding geopolitical disruptions: the role of supply chain logics

Samuel Roscoe (University of Sussex Business School, Brighton, UK)
Emel Aktas (Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
Kenneth J. Petersen (Michael F. Price College of Business, Helen Robson Walton Chair in Marketing Strategy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA)
Heather Dawn Skipworth (Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
Robert B. Handfield (Supply Chain Resource Cooperative, North Carolina State University Poole College of Management, Ralegih, North Carolina, USA)
Farooq Habib (Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)

International Journal of Operations & Production Management

ISSN: 0144-3577

Article publication date: 30 June 2022

Issue publication date: 12 August 2022

5330

Abstract

Purpose

Why do managers redesign global supply chains in a particular manner when faced with compounding geopolitical disruptions? In answering this research question, this study identifies a constrained system of reasoning (decision-making logic) employed by managers when they redesign their supply chains in situations of heightened uncertainty.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted 40 elite interviews with senior supply chain executives in 28 companies across nine industries from November 2019 to June 2020, when the UK was preparing to leave the European Union, the US–China trade war was escalating, and Covid-19 was spreading rapidly around the globe.

Findings

When redesigning global supply chains, the authors find that managerial decision-making logic is constrained by three distinct environmental ecosystem conditions: (1) the perceived intensity of institutional pressures; (2) the relative mobility of suppliers and supply chain assets; and (3) the perceived severity of the potential disruption risk. Intense government pressure and persistent geopolitical risk tend to impact firms in the same industry, resulting in similar approaches to decision-making regarding supply chain design. However, where suppliers are relatively immobile and supply chain assets are relatively fixed, a dominant logic is consistently present.

Originality/value

Building on an institutional logics perspective, this study finds that managerial decision-making under heightened uncertainty is not solely guided by institutional pressures but also by perceptions of the severity of risk related to potential supply chain disruption and the immobility of supply chain assets. These findings support the theoretical development of a novel construct that the authors term ‘supply chain logics’. Finally, this study provides a decision-making framework for Senior Executives competing in an increasingly complex and unstable business environment.

Keywords

Citation

Roscoe, S., Aktas, E., Petersen, K.J., Skipworth, H.D., Handfield, R.B. and Habib, F. (2022), "Redesigning global supply chains during compounding geopolitical disruptions: the role of supply chain logics", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 42 No. 9, pp. 1407-1434. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2021-0777

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles