To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Learning Style Inventory: A Research Note

PAAddison (Curtin University of Technology)

Asian Review of Accounting

ISSN: 1321-7348

Article publication date: 1 January 2000

557

Abstract

In a June 1998 Asian Review of Accounting: Special Education Issue article ‘Learning Styles Preferences of Accounting Students in Multicultural Cohorts’, R. Desai and D. Taylor discussed Kolb's Learning Style Inventory. This paper comments on that article. It cites Freedman and Stumpf's 1980 discussion of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI) in ‘Learning Style Inventory: Less than meets the eye.’ This article was one of the first of many criticisms, not only of the LSI‐1, but of the LSI‐11, the revised instrument issued by Kolb in 1984. Freedman and Stumpf's discussion started a debate that continues to this day. My response to research using the LSI should also involve an interactive response between reader and writer. This particular response comments on R. Desai's and D. Taylor's interpretations and cautions that some of them may be unintentionally misleading.

Citation

PAAddison (2000), "The Learning Style Inventory: A Research Note", Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060725

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles