To read this content please select one of the options below:

Industrial Discipline: A Suitable Case for Treatment

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 March 1986

329

Abstract

There is no clear evidence that British workplaces are any nearer the achievement of being representative bureaucracies as far as disciplinary rules are concerned as public policy initiatives are to placing the emphasis on a corrective as opposed to a punitive approach to Industrial discipline. The concept of industrial discipline is examined alongside forms of management control. Management aims and objectives and the difficulties management encounters in this sphere are considered. Worker attitudes and sources of complaints are discussed in the context of the type of involvement unions should have in the discipline process. The trend towards formalisation is explored and Its reasons, advantages and disadvantages discussed. Discipline Is still conflict‐prone and the reasons for this and ways to minimise it are examined. The work is based on an extensive review of the literature and an ESRC research project that examined disciplinary practice in eight different workplaces. Findings are based on interviews with personnel, line managers and shop stewards and examination of rule books, procedures and disciplinary records. The project was carried out during 1981–1983.

Keywords

Citation

Fenley, A. (1986), "Industrial Discipline: A Suitable Case for Treatment", Employee Relations, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 2-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb055072

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1986, MCB UP Limited

Related articles