Electronic Versus Printed Access to Reference Tools: Two Approaches

Abstract

Reference tools are prime candidates for replacement with their electronic counterparts, since finding the desired information in the shortest possible time and with the least possible effort is the primary concern of users of reference tools. Electronic versions of reference sources often provide enhanced access, as well as more definitive searching techniques. This article will describe two attempts made by the Evans Library at Texas A&M University to substitute reference tools with their electronic equivalents: one that failed from an economic standpoint and one that succeeded, attaining good user acceptance and reasonable costs.

Citation

Loomis, R., Jaros, J., Jackson, K. and Gilreath, C. (1987), "Electronic Versus Printed Access to Reference Tools: Two Approaches", Reference Services Review, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb048988