To read this content please select one of the options below:

Analyzing Insurance‐Linked Securities

Eduardo Canabarro (Vice president at Goldman, Sachs & Co., in New York)
Markus Finkemeier (Vice president at Goldman, Sachs & Co., in New York)
Richard R. Anderson (The chief actuary at Risk Management Solutions in Menlo Park, California)
Fouad Bendimerad (Technical director at Risk Management Solutions in Menlo Park, California)

Journal of Risk Finance

ISSN: 1526-5943

Article publication date: 1 January 2000

1188

Abstract

Insurance‐linked securities can benefit both issuers and investors; they supply insurance and reinsurance companies with additional risk capital at reasonable prices (with little or no credit risk), and supply excess returns to investors that are uncorrelated with the returns of other financial assets. This article explains the terminology of insurance and reinsurance, the structure of insurance‐linked securities, and provides an overview of major transactions. First, there is a discussion of how stochastic catastrophe modeling has been applied to assess the risk of natural catastrophes, including the reliability and validation of the risk models. Second, the authors compare the risk‐adjusted returns of recent securitizations on the basis of relative value. Compared with high‐yield bonds, catastrophe (“CAT”) bonds have wide spreads and very attractive Sharpe ratios. In fact, the risk‐adjusted returns on CAT bonds dominate high‐yield bonds. Furthermore, since natural catastrophe risk is essentially uncorrelated with market risk, high expected excess returns make CAT bonds high‐alpha assets. The authors illustrate this point and show that a relatively small allocation of insurance‐linked securities within a fixed income portfolio can enhance the expected return and simultaneously decrease risk, without significantly changing the skewness and kurtosis of the return distribution.

Citation

Canabarro, E., Finkemeier, M., Anderson, R.R. and Bendimerad, F. (2000), "Analyzing Insurance‐Linked Securities", Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 49-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb043445

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles