TY  - JOUR
AB  - When making going concern assessments, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 59 (Auditing Standards Board 1988) directs auditors to consider the nature of management's plans and ability to mitigate periods of financial distress successfully. Corporate governance factors reflect attributes of control, oversight, and/or support of management's plans and actions intended to overcome financial distress. Correspondingly, this study investigates the impact of certain corporate governance factors on the likelihood of a going concern modification. Using survival analysis techniques, we examine a sample of 161 financially distressed firms for the time period 1988–1996. We find that auditors are twice as likely to issue a going concern modification when the CEO is replaced. We also find that going concern modifications are inversely associated with blockholder ownership. We also confirm Carcello and Neal's (2000) findings with respect to the association between an independent audit committee and an increased likelihood of modification. In a repeated events setting, we find that insider ownership and board independence are inversely associated with repeated going concern modifications. Our study concludes by proposing implications for the current financial reporting environment (including the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002) and future research avenues.
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
SN  - 1475-7702
DO  - 10.1108/eb043428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/eb043428
AU  - Parker Susan
AU  - Peters Gary F.
AU  - Turetsky Howard F.
PY  - 2005
Y1  - 2005/01/01
TI  - Corporate Governance Factors and Auditor Going Concern Assessments
T2  - Review of Accounting and Finance
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 5
EP  - 29
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -