TERMINOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY IN ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE DISCIPLINES

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the vocabulary of a discipline whose major emphasis is on concrete phenomena will, on the average, have fewer synonyms per concept than will the vocabulary of a discipline whose major emphasis is on abstract phenomena. Subject terms from each of two concrete disciplines and two abstract disciplines were analysed. Results showed that there was a significant difference at the ·05 level between concrete and abstract disciplines but that the significant difference was attributable to only one of the abstract disciplines. The other abstract discipline was not significantly different from the two concrete disciplines. It was concluded that although there is some support for the hypothesis, at least one other factor has a stronger influence on terminological consistency than the phonomena with which a subject deals.

Citation

BONZI, S. (1984), "TERMINOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY IN ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE DISCIPLINES", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026767