THE INFLUENCE OF THE TYPE OF SOURCES USED ON THE RESULTS OF CITATION ANALYSES

Abstract

Most citation analyses are based on references taken from two or three source journals. There are good theoretical reasons for believing that these may not be representative of all references. In the social science citation analyses carried out as part of the DISISS programme, references were collected from 140 journals, including forty‐seven drawn at random from a comprehensive list, and also from 148 monographs. Analyses of references drawn from high ranking and randomly selected journals showed differences in date distribution, forms of material cited and rank order of journals cited. Analyses of references drawn from journals and monographs showed differences, some of them large, in date distributions, forms of material cited, subject self‐citation and citations beyond the social sciences, and countries of publication cited. These differences may be peculiar to the social sciences, but any citation analyses that are based on only a limited number and type of sources without specific justification must be regarded with suspicion.

Citation

LINE, M.B. (1979), "THE INFLUENCE OF THE TYPE OF SOURCES USED ON THE RESULTS OF CITATION ANALYSES", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026682