To read this content please select one of the options below:

Audit regulation: A partial solution expanded

Vivien Beattie (Department of Accounting, Finance and Law, University of Stirling, Stirling)
Richard Brandt (Research Fellow in the Department of Accounting and Management Science at Portsmouth Business School.)
Stella Fearnley (Department of Accounting and Management Science, University of Portsmouth, Locksway Road, Portsmouth, Hants)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 January 1999

206

Abstract

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) issued a consultation document in November 1998, which set out a framework for the independent regulation of the accountancy profession. This framework broadly adopts the proposals put forward by the profession itself. In this paper, the focus is on audit regulation. The current regime is outlined and its structural weaknesses and procedural problems identified. The proposed reforms are described and critically evaluated. It is argued that the proposed reforms offer only a partial solution to regulatory concerns, since no changes are proposed to the existing regime either for registration, or for monitoring and discipline of the majority of audit cases. An expanded framework that rationalises current practices and provides a more comprehensive solution is suggested. A critical feature of the proposal is that a distinction is made between audits of small entities and audits of major listed companies, only the latter of which are of public interest. Each would have distinct licensing and monitoring procedures.

Citation

Beattie, V., Brandt, R. and Fearnley, S. (1999), "Audit regulation: A partial solution expanded", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024995

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles