PATTERNS OF STYLES IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS

Abstract

Most studies of conflict handling styles in organizations analyze these styles separately. These studies assume that individuals are oriented towards the use of one of the styles of conflict management. As a result, different styles are compared one by one as if they were independent. In contrast, from a more all‐embracing perspective people are seen as adopting configurations of styles. The interest in this alternative perspective lies in exploring the relations between these styles, how they combine and form patterns of conflict styles. This article presents an exploratory study that seeks to identify empirically the specific combinations of conflict handling styles that result in differentiated patterns within groups of managers. By using hierarchical and non‐hierarchical cluster analyses of a sample of managers, different patterns of conflict management were identified. The effectiveness of each of the resulting patterns was analyzed in terms of its influence on the parties' joint substantive outcomes and their mutual relationship. Results show that patterns using multiple conflict handling styles were more effective than patterns based on a single style.

Citation

Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Peiró, J.M. and Euwema, M. (1999), "PATTERNS OF STYLES IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022816