POTENTIAL CONFLICT, CONFLICT STIMULUS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST

Bruno Dyck (University of Manitoba, Canada)
Nealia S. Bruning (University of Manitoba, Canada)
Leo Driedger (University of Manitoba, Canada)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Publication date: 1 April 1996

Abstract

Generally, this study contributes to our understanding of the situations when conflict facilitates performance versus when it hampers performance. More specifically, the study distinguishes between conflict potential, conflict stimulus, and actual conflict. We present two hypotheses that compare two competing views to further disentangle whether and when conflict is functional. Our empirical tests, using a sample of Mennonite congregations, lead us to speculate that conflict may be functional for individual‐centered performance measures, but dysfunctional for group‐based performance measures.

Citation

Dyck, B., Bruning, N. and Driedger, L. (1996), "POTENTIAL CONFLICT, CONFLICT STIMULUS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022785

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.