To read this content please select one of the options below:

STRATEGIC CHOICE IN EVERYDAY DISPUTES

Mark E. Keating (State University of New York at Buffalo)
Dean G. Pruitt (State University of New York at Buffalo)
Rachael A. Eberle (State University of New York at Buffalo)
Joseph M. Mikolic (State University of New York at Buffalo)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Article publication date: 1 February 1994

334

Abstract

A variety of strategies were identified in interview‐based chronologies of ordinary interpersonal conflicts. Verbal confrontation with the adversary was the most common strategy and usually preceded other approaches. Efforts to arrange mediation and arbitration were extremely rare, though third parties were approached for other reasons in most of the cases. It was possible to distinguish complainants from respondents in 61 percent of the cases. Respondents employed more problem solving and apology than complainants, while complainants employed marginally more pressure tactics.

Citation

Keating, M.E., Pruitt, D.G., Eberle, R.A. and Mikolic, J.M. (1994), "STRATEGIC CHOICE IN EVERYDAY DISPUTES", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022740

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1994, MCB UP Limited

Related articles