ARBITRATION AND THE SMALL PROJECT OWNER: SOME THOUGHTS AND SUGGESTIONS

Gregory C. Thomas (Blount, Inc.)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Publication date: 1 April 1991

Abstract

This article asserts that standard form arbitration clauses do not encourage fast and economical resolution of disputes on small construction projects. Furthermore, standard form clauses are frequently a hindrance to that goal. Instead of reliance on preprinted forms, both owners of projects and contractors will be more likely to resolve disputes by devoting sufficient time and legal talent to preparation of tailor made dispute resolution provisions. Such provisions must take into account the needs of the individual parties involved, as well as the legal climate of the community. Absent this attention to detail, use of a standard form arbitration clause leads to the same waste of resources as litigation and the frequently dissatisfying results that follow. It is also argued that in certain cases preservation of the right to litigate narrow legal issues is to be preferred over arbitration.

Citation

Thomas, G.C. (1991), "ARBITRATION AND THE SMALL PROJECT OWNER: SOME THOUGHTS AND SUGGESTIONS", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022703

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1991, MCB UP Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.