To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Managerial Law

Managerial Law

ISSN: 0309-0558

Article publication date: 1 January 1976

Downloads
380

Abstract

The Howard Shuttering Contractors case throws considerable light on the importance which the tribunals attach to warnings before dismissing an employee. In this case the tribunal took great pains to interpret the intention of the parties to the different site agreements, and it came to the conclusion that the agreed procedure was not followed. One other matter, which must be particularly noted by employers, is that where a final warning is required, this final warning must be “a warning”, and not the actual dismissal. So that where, for example, three warnings are to be given, the third must be a “warning”. It is after the employee has misconducted himself thereafter that the employer may dismiss.

Citation

(1976), "Managerial Law", Managerial Law, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022384

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1976, MCB UP Limited