FOSTER v. FLEXILE METAL COMPANY LTD.

Abstract

May 12,1967 Factory — Dangerous machinery (fencing) — Guard provided and ready for use — Machine being re‐set — Guard provided for operation not used by workman — Whether machine “fenced” — Workman re‐setting machine without calling on help of assistant — Whether reckless — Whether amounting to contributory negligence — Factories Act, 1961 (9 & 10 Eliz.II, c.34), ss. 14,16.

Citation

Paull, J. (1968), "FOSTER v. FLEXILE METAL COMPANY LTD.", Managerial Law, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021492