To read this content please select one of the options below:

Is systematic osteoporosis prevention and detection possible in a district hospital?

Thomas J. Ulahannan (Senior Registrar in Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU)
Linda A. Lavelle (Senior Clinical Audit Facilitator, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust, Rothwell Road, Kettering, Northants NN16 8UZ, UK.)

Journal of Clinical Effectiveness

ISSN: 1361-5874

Article publication date: 1 February 1997

42

Abstract

Osteoporosis demands systematic management for optimum use of resources. Guidelines from the Primary Care Rheumatology Society (PCRS) aim to improve its diagnosis and treatment. We identified all admissions over three months to a district general hospital of patients with fracture of femur, vertebra, or distal forearm and of women who underwent oophorectomy or hysterectomy. We audited their care using the criteria that the diagnosis and risk of osteoporosis should be recorded; that management should follow PCRS guidelines; and that this information should be communicated to general practitioners. An ideal standard of 100% compliance with these criteria was chosen. Overwhelmingly these audit criteria were not met, the only one that was met being the prescription of hormone replacement therapy after oophorectomy. Potential for prevention of 35% of hip and distal forearm fractures was identified, the commonest risk factor being long‐term corticosteroid therapy. Identification of high risk patients is feasible by simple methods and their management needs improvement. We suggest that a ‘long‐term corticosteroid therapy register’ and a dedicated ‘osteoporosis service’ would facilitate this.

Citation

Ulahannan, T.J. and Lavelle, L.A. (1997), "Is systematic osteoporosis prevention and detection possible in a district hospital?", Journal of Clinical Effectiveness, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 43-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb020863

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles