TY  - JOUR
AB  - Corporate finance is under attack. Commentators mention that corporate managers have enriched themselves and shareholders, and in the process have failed to consider the interests of all stakeholders (Hennessy, 1989, Alkhafaji, 1989, Newton, 1989, Dunfee, 1989, Steidlmeier, 1989, Jones and Hunt, 1991). They cite the active corporate control market that produced hostile takeovers, leveraged buyouts, and corporate restructuring activity, all presumably causing a reduction in social welfare. This view is now beginning to permeate itself into the financial education debate. For example, Hawley (1991) suggests that financial educators are abdicating their responsibility of helping prepare corporate managers to recognize and deal with business ethics‐social responsibility effectively. Hawley proposes that the shareholder wealth maximization model for corporate management rationalizes the commission of unethical or socially irresponsible actions. Because of this ongoing criticism being levied against the practice of corporate finance, financial educators are now moving to incorporate ethics in the finance curricula. Although this move may be welcomed, we suggest that financial educators proceed with caution.
VL  - 22
IS  - 4
SN  - 0307-4358
DO  - 10.1108/eb018555
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018555
AU  - Dufrene Uric
AU  - Wong Alan
PY  - 1996
Y1  - 1996/01/01
TI  - Stakeholders Versus Stockholders and Financial Ethics: Ethics to Whom?
T2  - Managerial Finance
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -