TY  - JOUR
AB  - Employers in the UK are under a legal obligation to ensure that their recruitment procedures conform with the Sex Discrimination Act (1975), which states that employers must not discriminate or indicate any hidden intention to discriminate against a potential employee on the grounds of their sex. Yet the very fact that many jobs are still viewed as ‘male’ or ‘female’ is often sufficient to prevent the non‐dominant gender group from applying for those positions (Ray, 1990). Managerial jobs have traditionally been male dominated and organisations are under a legal obligation to ensure that their recruitment procedures do not indicate any intention to discriminate, either overtly or covertly. Therefore, organisations need not only to demonstrate that they have no intention to discriminate, especially in traditionally male dominated occupations such as management, but they also need to ensure that their intention not to discriminate is clearly and explicitly communicated to potential job applicants (Ray, 1990). The aim of this article is to address the similarities and differences between the job search experiences of unemployed female and male managers, and to present the research findings from an in‐depth study of unemployed British managers.
VL  - 16
IS  - 6/7
SN  - 0261-0159
DO  - 10.1108/eb010699
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/eb010699
AU  - Fielden Sandra L.
AU  - Davidson Marilyn J.
PY  - 1997
Y1  - 1997/01/01
TI  - Equal Opportunities in Recruitment: The Job Search Experiences of Unemployed Female and Male Managers
T2  - Equal Opportunities International
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 50
EP  - 59
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -