To read this content please select one of the options below:

Life Cycle Leadership Theory: Some Empirical Evidence

KEITH F. PUNCH (Senior Lecturer in Education at the University of Western Australia. He holds the degrees of M.A. (Western Australia) and Ph.D. (Toronto).)
DAVID J. DUCHARME (Development Officer, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. He holds the degree of M.A. of the University of Toronto.)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 January 1972

701

Abstract

Initiating Structure and Consideration provide a simple, powerful and popular way of describing the behaviour of leaders. Tile determination of leader effectiveness poses added methodological and theoretical demands for the researcher, however. Hersey and Blanchard's “Life Cycle Leadership Theory” represents one such approach. The study reported below, conducted in Toronto, tested two hypotheses that suggested inverse relationships between maturity level of teachers and the degree to which they prefer task‐oriented and relationships‐oriented leader behavior. Limited support was found for the hypotheses but the authors discern some important trends and suggest relevant areas for future research.

Citation

PUNCH, K.F. and DUCHARME, D.J. (1972), "Life Cycle Leadership Theory: Some Empirical Evidence", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009673

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1972, MCB UP Limited

Related articles