To read this content please select one of the options below:

Theory and Research Needs in the Study of American Educational Politics

FREDERICK M. WIRT (Lecturer in Education and Research Political Scientist, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley. He holds the degrees of B.A. from De Pauw University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the Ohio State University. Dr. Wirt has published extensively in the field of the politics of education. He is a member of numerous political science associations.)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 January 1970

207

Abstract

This article employs a system analytic framework to categorize the available research literature on the politics of education in order to explain the inter‐relationship of private and public interests and of different levels in primary and secondary American schools. The objectives are several: to explain and develop the analytical framework of David Easton; to illustrate its heuristic utility by categorizing empirically‐based research within the components of that framework, and to suggest and encourage future research directions in the subject. Education has escaped application of traditional policy analysis in America because educators have convinced scholars and laymen that they are “non‐political,” a label which even most political scientists have accepted without challenge. However, during the 1960s, a few scholars in education and political science began to apply political analytical methods to public school conflict. This research has begun to change perceptions of education and to provide a beginning set of research projects whose data support tentative generalization about the policy‐making process and the total system of public schools. This orientation is bound to increase because of increasing national government intervention in local schools, both through integration and financial policies. These have provoked growing conflict locally over the proper direction of school policies. In this article, we see how such stress is transmitted in the form of “demands” and “supports” into the “political system”, that persistent social mechanism known in all societies in different forms provides an “authoritative allocation of values and resources”. The political system, in this case public school bodies, “converts” such “inputs” into “outputs” of public policy, which in their administration create outcomes which later cause a “feedback” into the political system as the material for new policy demands. For each component of this Eastonian system, this article examines relevant research, providing an extensive annotated bibliography. From this review, it is possible to suggest lines of needed research.

Citation

WIRT, F.M. (1970), "Theory and Research Needs in the Study of American Educational Politics", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 53-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009645

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1970, MCB UP Limited

Related articles