To read this content please select one of the options below:

Santayanan—Weberian Reason in Administration

HARRY J. HARTLEY (Head of the Division of Educational Administration and Supervision, New York University. He is a member of the American Economic Association, Phi Delta Kappa and the Society for General Systems Theory. Dr. Hartley holds the degrees of B.A., M.A. and Ed.D.. He is the author of numerous publications including Educational Planning—Programming—Budgeting: A Systems Approach. (Prentice‐Hall, 1968).. (Prentice‐Hall, 1968.))

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 January 1969

2385

Abstract

The major purpose is to provide a philosophic basis for the study and practice of educational administration. An explicit assumption is that logical, propositional thought is a desirable prelude to action. Reason, which is defined as an organic harmony of impulses, is related to administration via three levels of discourse: 1) philosophic values (WHY), 2) hypothetico‐deductive theory (HOW), and 3) observed behavior (WHAT). The first level is defined by the discursive thought of the moral philosopher Santayana. His definition of rational ethics provides a foundation for administrative‐organizational theory in general, and the concept of bureaucracy in particular. The second level includes Weber's pure‐type structural model that has rationality as its dominant characteristic. The third level, administrative practice, or praxeology, is portrayed as a derivative of rational thought. Current approaches, including systems analysis and program budgeting, are rooted in the union of the logic of Santayana's ethics and Weber's structural model for human groupings.

Citation

HARTLEY, H.J. (1969), "Santayanan—Weberian Reason in Administration", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009631

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1969, MCB UP Limited

Related articles