TY  - JOUR
AB  - HAVING outlined the scheme for monotyped catalogues, it only remains to consider it in its financial aspects. At Hampstead tenders were obtained for the same catalogue by monotype, linotype, and by ordinary setting up. It may be mentioned that the catalogue is of royal‐octavo size, in double columns, each being fifteen ems wide and fifty deep. Main entries are in bourgeois; subject‐headings are set (by hand) in clarendon, and the entries under such headings are put in brevier. Notes and contents were specified for either minion or nonpareil, and many lines break into part‐italics. The monotype machine provided all these founts except the two already mentioned—italic numerals and clarendon. We had to do without the former type, but the latter not being numerous are easily carried in as wanted from an ordinary case. Naturally, I cannot give the exact figures of the accepted tender, but it may be stated that in our particular case the cheapest quotation was for linotype work, although there was not much difference between that and monotyping; whilst for both these methods worked out at appreciably less than the quotations for ordinary hand‐work.
VL  - 5
IS  - 12
SN  - 0307-4803
DO  - 10.1108/eb008856
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008856
PY  - 1903
Y1  - 1903/01/01
TI  - The Library World Volume 5 Issue 12
T2  - New Library World
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 308
EP  - 336
Y2  - 2024/04/20
ER  -