To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

The Library World Volume 5 Issue 12

New Library World

ISSN: 0307-4803

Article publication date: 1 June 1903

Abstract

HAVING outlined the scheme for monotyped catalogues, it only remains to consider it in its financial aspects. At Hampstead tenders were obtained for the same catalogue by monotype, linotype, and by ordinary setting up. It may be mentioned that the catalogue is of royal‐octavo size, in double columns, each being fifteen ems wide and fifty deep. Main entries are in bourgeois; subject‐headings are set (by hand) in clarendon, and the entries under such headings are put in brevier. Notes and contents were specified for either minion or nonpareil, and many lines break into part‐italics. The monotype machine provided all these founts except the two already mentioned—italic numerals and clarendon. We had to do without the former type, but the latter not being numerous are easily carried in as wanted from an ordinary case. Naturally, I cannot give the exact figures of the accepted tender, but it may be stated that in our particular case the cheapest quotation was for linotype work, although there was not much difference between that and monotyping; whilst for both these methods worked out at appreciably less than the quotations for ordinary hand‐work.

Citation

(1903), "The Library World Volume 5 Issue 12", New Library World, Vol. 5 No. 12, pp. 308-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008856

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1903, MCB UP Limited