Economic loss: Closing Pandora's Box?

M.G. Ross (Lecturer in Law, Faculty of Law, Leicester University)

Structural Survey

ISSN: 0263-080X

Publication date: 1 January 1989

Abstract

Five years ago, Junior Books v Veitchi [1983] 1 AC 520; 2/1 SS 58 was feared by professionals to be the opening salvo by the courts in an attack which would expand the scope of tort rights at the expense of the sanctity of contractual arrangements. Since then, however, most courts have found ways of ignoring, side‐stepping or rewriting that infamous House of Lords judgment. Recent decisions by the Court of Appeal provide strong evidence that the most far‐reaching implications of Junior Books have been resisted. Indeed, it will be seen that the relationship of tort and contract may be even less favourable to Plaintiffs today than it was in the period immediately prior to that landmark.

Citation

Ross, M.G. (1989), "Economic loss: Closing Pandora's Box?", Structural Survey, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 82-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb006304

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1989, MCB UP Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.