To read this content please select one of the options below:

The San Diego City Schools: Enterprise Resource Planning Return on Investment

Publication date: 20 January 2017

Abstract

This case focuses on the challenge of quantifying the return on investment (ROI) of a large technology project, enterprise resource planning (ERP), in the nonprofit environment of the San Diego City Schools. The school district does not generate a profit, so traditional revenue enhancement arguments do not work. Instead, the case discusses the internal processes re-design and system consolidation enabled by the new ERP system. The system ROI is composed of two major components: cost savings from removal of legacy applications and productivity improvements. The cost containment benefits are relatively straightforward to quantify, but do not justify the system. The productivity improvements are harder to quantify, and many can be categorized as soft benefits. Furthermore, many of the productivity and cost-saving benefits will not be realized without personnel reductions, which are especially difficult in school districts and government agencies. The case debrief therefore discusses the tradeoffs quantifying soft benefits and productivity improvements, best practices for management decision making, and the organizational change necessary to realize the ROI.

The case teaches students how to analyze ROI for a large enterprise IT system in nonprofit or government organizations. Financial ROI is applicable for the hard cost benefits but some benefits are more difficult to quantify, and students learn how to factor these into the decision making as well. In addition, organizational change can be particularly challenging in the government or nonprofit context; the case enables a discussion of strategies for workforce re-deployment in these settings.

Keywords

Citation

Jeffery, M., Kulick, N., Riitters, T., Abbott, S., Papp, D., Schad, T., Wallace, J. and Wiemann, J. (2017), "The San Diego City Schools: Enterprise Resource Planning Return on Investment", . https://doi.org/10.1108/case.kellogg.2016.000363

Publisher

:

Kellogg School of Management

Copyright © 2006, The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University

Related articles