TY  - JOUR
AB  - This case explains marketing process for follow-on equity offerings, the direct and indirect costs of issue, and the long-run performance of equity issuers. Students use analysts' projections from which to estimate the intrinsic value of the company's share—including the cost savings from the VEBA and financial improvements over the next several years. It is appropriate for use in corporate finance courses covering the topics of capital raising, equity financing, capital structure, costs of financing, funding alternatives, investment banking, and valuation. It presents the classic profile on an equity issuer—a firm whose stock price has risen to new heights in recent months. Will the issue lead to additional value that creates opportunities for shareholders, or is it a sign the firm is overvalued? The case explores the thinking of a prominent investment manager who had accumulated a large stake in Goodyear and who did not see the need for Goodyear to make an equity issue at this time. The company's position was that the high stock would allow it to further strengthen its balance sheet and pursue international growth opportunities. Students are asked to decide what the investor should do with respect to the current offer—buy, sell, or hold.
VL  - 
IS  - 
SN  - 2474-7890
DO  - 10.1108/case.darden.2016.000139
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/case.darden.2016.000139
AU  - Chaplinsky Susan
AU  - Estey Warren
PY  - 2017
Y1  - 2017/01/01
TI  - Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company: Follow-On Equity Issue
T2  - Darden Business Publishing Cases
PB  - University of Virginia Darden School Foundation
SP  - 1
EP  - 20
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -