Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate corporate social disclosure (CSD) assurance from a stakeholder perspective within a study which encompasses both stakeholder preferences and demand drivers of CSD assurance.
Design/methodology/approach
Stakeholder perceptions of and their demand for CSD assurance are examined through a questionnaire survey. The analysis is based on responses in an empirical study from 147 organisations which are investing, procuring and third-sector stakeholders.
Findings
Overall, stakeholder comments suggest an emphasis on the importance of specialist environmental assurors and the role of trust. The demand for assurance is positively related to stakeholders’ assessment of the value of CSD and the use of information from information intermediaries such as responsible investment indices, and negatively related to stakeholder perceptions of CSD representational faithfulness.
Research limitations/implications
This paper only draws on data from the UK. Similar research can be explored in a context outside the UK.
Practical implications
Better understanding of stakeholder defined determinants of the demand for CSD assurance as well as their perceptions of CSD assurance will inform regulators and enable companies to better discharge accountability towards stakeholders.
Originality/value
This is one of the few empirical studies that investigate CSD assurance and one of the first to focus on stakeholder perceptions of, and demand for, CSD assurance within a multiple stakeholder perspective, rather than practitioner or corporate perceptions of CSD assurance.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of the two anonymous reviewers and the editor. The authors would also like to thank Dr Sam Miles for her helpful comments on the working drafts of this paper.
Citation
Wong, R. and Millington, A. (2014), "Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 863-887. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1389
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited