To read this content please select one of the options below:

Commentary on “Developing a logic model for implementing citizen advocacy for adults with learning disabilities based on the experience of community inclusion centres for disabled people”

Matt Clifton (bemix c.i.c, Canterbury, UK)
Steve Chapman (bemix c.i.c, Canterbury, UK)

Tizard Learning Disability Review

ISSN: 1359-5474

Article publication date: 23 May 2022

Issue publication date: 19 August 2022

203

Abstract

Purpose

This commentary reflects on peer advocacy in relation to citizen advocacy in the context of the vital need for advocacy in all its different forms.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors reflect from the standpoint of developing peer advocacy in secure mental health settings as an organisation based on self-advocacy and co-production.

Findings

By reflecting on peer advocacy and citizen advocacy side by side, the authors affirm both and all kinds of advocacy as being vital to people with learning disabilities living full and free lives as citizens.

Originality/value

The authors hope this commentary will enrich people’s understandings of the essential role of peer advocacy within different kinds of advocacy, and the need to enlarge the range of possibilities and choices open to a person.

Keywords

Citation

Clifton, M. and Chapman, S. (2022), "Commentary on “Developing a logic model for implementing citizen advocacy for adults with learning disabilities based on the experience of community inclusion centres for disabled people”", Tizard Learning Disability Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-04-2022-0010

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles